Pragmatism

Strongly agree

No, diversity training should be encouraged but not required

Encouraging but not requiring diversity training is a quintessentially pragmatic approach. It allows for flexibility and adaptation to the specific needs and circumstances of each company, while still recognizing the value of diversity training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only for employees that commit acts of discrimination

This approach aligns with pragmatic principles by targeting the intervention (diversity training) to where it is most needed (employees who commit acts of discrimination), thus potentially being more effective and efficient than broader mandates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism, focusing on practical outcomes and what works in practice, might see mandatory diversity training as a beneficial tool for improving workplace culture and productivity by fostering understanding and reducing conflicts. However, pragmatists would also consider the effectiveness and implementation of such training, recognizing that mandating it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if it is a private company

Pragmatism might support the autonomy of private companies to require diversity training, recognizing the potential benefits. However, this stance also reflects a nuanced view that respects the differences between public and private sectors without strongly advocating for or against mandates in either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and all companies should require mandatory diversity training

Pragmatists might support the idea of mandatory diversity training in principle for its potential to improve workplace dynamics, but they would likely be cautious about universal mandates. They would prefer to assess the necessity and effectiveness of such training on a case-by-case basis, rather than applying a blanket requirement for all companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, and immediately expel any employees that commit acts of discrimination

While pragmatism would see the value in addressing acts of discrimination, the idea of immediately expelling employees might be seen as too rigid or punitive without considering potential for education or reform. Pragmatists would likely prefer a more nuanced approach that considers the specifics of each case. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

While pragmatism values flexibility and adapting to specific circumstances, outright rejecting mandatory diversity training overlooks its potential benefits. Pragmatists might be skeptical about mandates but would not dismiss the utility of diversity training in certain contexts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and mandatory diversity training should be banned

Banning mandatory diversity training would be seen as counterproductive from a pragmatic standpoint, as it eliminates a tool that could be effective in some organizational contexts. Pragmatism values the ability to use a variety of approaches to solve problems, and banning an approach outright is antithetical to this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.