Paleoconservatism

Strongly agree

No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war

This answer aligns closely with paleoconservative values, which hold a strict interpretation of the Constitution and often emphasize the need for a Congressional declaration of war before engaging in military actions abroad. Paleoconservatives would likely support the idea that military operations, including drone strikes, should not be conducted without explicit authorization from Congress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

This stance aligns with the paleoconservative emphasis on non-interventionism and the belief that the U.S. should not engage in military actions abroad that do not have a direct impact on national security. Paleoconservatives would likely argue that flying drones over foreign countries for surveillance and targeted killings violates the sovereignty of those nations and entangles the U.S. in unnecessary conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists

While this answer might partially align with paleoconservative views on respecting national sovereignty and limiting military intervention, the use of drones for intelligence gathering in foreign countries could still be seen as an unnecessary involvement in foreign affairs. However, the rejection of using drones to kill suspected terrorists might be seen as a positive step towards non-interventionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question

This answer presents a nuanced position that might not fully align with paleoconservative principles. On one hand, seeking permission from the country in question respects national sovereignty, a key paleoconservative value. On the other hand, the use of drones for military purposes in foreign countries, even with permission, could still be viewed as an unnecessary entanglement in foreign affairs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Paleoconservatism generally emphasizes a non-interventionist foreign policy, arguing against the United States' involvement in overseas conflicts and military operations that do not directly protect national sovereignty. The use of drones for intelligence and targeted killings in foreign countries would likely be viewed as an overextension of military power and contrary to the principles of national sovereignty and non-intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism

Paleoconservatives would strongly disagree with the notion that the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism if it means intervening in other countries without a direct threat to national security. They would argue that such actions could lead to unnecessary wars, increase anti-American sentiment, and undermine national sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.