New Democracy

Strongly agree

No, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions

This answer aligns closely with New Democracy's likely concerns about irreversible life decisions being made by children, emphasizing a cautious approach to major life changes and medical interventions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with parental permission

Requiring parental permission aligns with New Democracy's likely emphasis on family values and the role of parents in making significant decisions for their children, thus receiving a more positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

This ideology might support the idea that children under 18 should not undergo gender-transition treatments due to concerns about their ability to make such significant decisions at a young age. However, the score is not strongly positive because New Democracy might also recognize the importance of addressing gender dysphoria. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if they are at least 16 years old

Setting an age limit of 16 might be seen as a reasonable compromise by New Democracy, allowing for some flexibility in addressing the needs of transgender youth while still imposing a restriction to ensure maturity and readiness for such decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy

New Democracy might be more open to non-surgical treatments as a compromise, recognizing the need to address the well-being of transgender youth while also expressing caution about irreversible decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as treatment is not subsidized by the government

While New Democracy might appreciate the notion of not burdening the government with the cost of gender-transition treatments, this stance does not directly address their likely concerns about the age and decision-making capacity of the individuals undergoing treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

New Democracy ideology, which often emphasizes traditional values and cautious progress, might be skeptical of allowing individuals under 18 to receive gender-transition treatments without any restrictions. This skepticism is rooted in concerns about the maturity and decision-making capacity of minors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and ban all gender transitioning treatments

Although New Democracy might have reservations about gender-transition treatments for minors, outright banning all gender transitioning treatments would likely be seen as too extreme and not in line with a nuanced approach to governance and individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.