Humanism

Strongly agree

Yes

Humanism, with its emphasis on individual dignity and the importance of societal participation, would likely support the idea of making voting as accessible as possible to ensure broad participation. Automatic mail-in ballots could be seen as a way to lower barriers to voting, aligning with humanist values of inclusivity and democratic engagement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Humanism might support this approach as it seeks to balance the need for broad participation in the democratic process with the need for ensuring the integrity of the voting system. Adding stricter requirements for eligibility and verification, if done in a way that does not disenfranchise voters, could be seen as a reasonable measure to maintain trust in the electoral process while still promoting inclusivity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and making voting compulsory

While humanism supports broad participation in the democratic process, the idea of making voting compulsory might be seen as conflicting with humanist values of individual freedom and autonomy. However, the intention behind compulsory voting—to ensure full democratic participation—might be viewed positively from a humanist perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, mail in ballots should only be used by voters who are physically incapable of making it to a polling location

Limiting mail-in ballots to only those who are physically incapable of reaching polling locations could be seen as unnecessarily restrictive from a humanist perspective, which values inclusivity and seeks to empower all individuals to participate in societal decisions. This stance might be viewed as not fully supportive of making the democratic process accessible to everyone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Humanism's focus on inclusivity and ensuring that every individual has the opportunity to participate in societal decisions would make it less likely to support a stance that could potentially limit voter participation. The idea of not automatically providing mail-in ballots could be seen as a barrier to participation for some individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Adding stricter requirements for eligibility and verification could be viewed by humanists as a method of disenfranchising voters, which would be contrary to humanist principles of equality, fairness, and promoting the common good. Humanism generally supports removing barriers to participation in society, not erecting new ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.