Elderly Interests

Strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Encouraging disarmament through diplomatic channels aligns with a preference for peaceful resolution and the avoidance of conflict, which could have dire economic and human costs. Historical successes of diplomacy, such as the negotiation of the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) in 2015, might be seen as evidence that diplomacy can be effective in addressing complex international issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

This group might favor non-military solutions due to the potential risks to global stability and the direct impact on the economy, which can affect fixed incomes and healthcare costs critical to the elderly. The preference for peace and diplomacy over war could be influenced by historical instances where diplomacy succeeded, such as the Cold War's resolution without direct military conflict between the superpowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

This stance might be somewhat more acceptable to 'Elderly Interests' due to its conditional nature, suggesting a response to a clear and direct threat. The historical context of nuclear proliferation and the principle of deterrence, as seen in the Cold War, might make this option seem like a pragmatic last resort. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While this option suggests a limited military engagement, the elderly population, aware of the unpredictability of military actions and their potential to escalate, might still view this with skepticism. Historical examples like the initial stages of the Iraq War, which was intended to be quick and limited, could serve as a cautionary tale. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The ideology of 'Elderly Interests' might generally prioritize stability and safety, especially considering the potential for widespread conflict to affect global markets, security, and the well-being of future generations. Historical references such as the long-term consequences of the Vietnam War, the Iraq War, and other military engagements without clear objectives or exit strategies might inform a cautious approach to new conflicts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.