Economic Interventionism

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic interventionism supports the idea that the government should play a significant role in the economy to correct market failures and promote social welfare. Requiring all new cars to be electric or hybrid by a certain date aligns with interventionist policies aimed at reducing environmental pollution and combating climate change, which are seen as market failures due to the negative externalities associated with gasoline-powered vehicles. Historical precedents include government interventions in the auto industry for safety and environmental standards, such as the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

From the perspective of economic interventionism, opposing a mandate that requires all new cars to be electric or hybrid would be inconsistent with its principles of addressing market failures and promoting public goods, such as environmental protection. However, the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement because interventionists might also consider the economic impact on industries and consumers, advocating for a balanced approach that includes incentives and transitional support rather than outright mandates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.