Christian Democracy

Agree

Yes

Christian Democracy, with its emphasis on social market economy and the protection of individual rights within a community framework, would likely support the idea of citizens being able to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This approach balances individual freedom with a level of government oversight, aligning with the Christian Democratic value of subsidiarity, which advocates for decisions to be made at the most local level possible but allows for higher-level intervention when necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Christian Democracy generally supports the idea of personal freedom and responsibility within a framework of social welfare and ethical standards. The outright prohibition of self-hosted digital wallets would likely be seen as an excessive restriction on personal freedom and financial autonomy, conflicting with the Christian Democratic principle of subsidiarity and the protection of individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While Christian Democracy values individual freedom, it also emphasizes the common good and the need for ethical standards in public life. Allowing the use of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could be seen as enabling activities that are against the common good, such as tax evasion or funding illegal activities. This stance would likely conflict with the Christian Democratic emphasis on ethical financial practices and the need for some level of government oversight to ensure the common good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

The idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would likely be seen as too invasive by Christian Democracy standards. This ideology supports a balance between individual rights and social responsibilities, and such a ban could be perceived as a violation of personal privacy and autonomy. Christian Democracy advocates for government intervention only when necessary to protect the common good, and a blanket ban with mandatory government backdoors could be viewed as overreach and a threat to individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.