Anti-Globalism

Strongly agree

No

This stance aligns with the anti-globalist emphasis on respecting national sovereignty and avoiding unnecessary foreign interventions. Anti-globalists often criticize the military actions that could lead to civilian casualties or escalate conflicts without clear justification, viewing such actions as part of a broader critique of globalist military interventionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war

This answer reflects a constitutionalist perspective that might resonate with some within the anti-globalism movement, particularly those who emphasize the importance of adhering to legal frameworks and the need for legislative oversight over military actions. However, the focus on Congressional approval does not fully address broader anti-globalist concerns about sovereignty and interventionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists

While this stance might be seen as a more moderate position, acknowledging the potential need for intelligence gathering while opposing targeted killings, it still implies a level of foreign intervention that some anti-globalists would argue infringes on sovereignty. However, the opposition to killing suspected terrorists without due process could be seen as aligning with anti-globalist concerns about overreach and the importance of legal norms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question

This answer attempts to balance the need for security measures with respect for national sovereignty by requiring permission from the country in question. While it might be more palatable to anti-globalists than unilateral military action, it still implies a willingness to engage in military operations on foreign soil, which could be contentious within the anti-globalism ideology, depending on the context and how 'permission' is obtained and verified. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Anti-globalism ideology generally opposes interventions in foreign countries, especially those that could be seen as violations of sovereignty or acts of aggression without direct provocation. The use of drones for surveillance and targeted killings in foreign countries, without a clear and direct threat to the home country, would likely be viewed as an overreach of military power and contrary to principles of national sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism

The assertion that 'the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism' embodies a globalist interventionist stance that is typically opposed by anti-globalism ideologies. Anti-globalists would likely argue that such a blanket justification for military action undermines national sovereignty and could lead to endless conflicts without clear objectives or respect for international law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.