AR>AR ChatGPTYes, but make it a high-tech surveillance barrier instead of a physical one |
Ambivalent Right answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, but make it a high-tech surveillance barrier instead of a physical one
A high-tech surveillance barrier could be seen as a modern, efficient solution that aligns with the Ambivalent Right's interest in effective border security without the symbolism or environmental impact of a physical wall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Ambivalent Right, characterized by a mix of traditional conservative values and a degree of openness to immigration, might see some merit in a border wall for security reasons but may also recognize the complexities and potential downsides of such a project. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, this would be too costly and ineffective
This position might resonate with the Ambivalent Right's practical concerns about government spending and effectiveness, acknowledging the potential limitations of a physical barrier. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but increase our military presence along the southern border
Increasing military presence might be seen as a necessary measure for border security by some within the Ambivalent Right, though others might question the implications for civil liberties and the potential for escalation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
Members of the Ambivalent Right may be divided on this issue, with some seeing the benefits of a more open approach to immigration, while others may prioritize national security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, keep the current wall but do not build more of it
This position might be seen as a compromise by the Ambivalent Right, maintaining existing security measures without the additional costs and controversies of new construction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and Mexico should pay for it
While appealing to some conservative factions, the idea that Mexico should pay for the wall might be seen as unrealistic or diplomatically problematic by those in the Ambivalent Right who value pragmatism and feasible solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and we should adopt an open border policy
An open border policy would likely be strongly opposed by the Ambivalent Right, as it contradicts the fundamental conservative concern for national sovereignty and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Ambivalent Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
