Try the political quiz

ideologies  ›  Policies  ›  Criminal

Ambivalent Right

Maintaining traditional societal structures while also recognizing the need for progress and change in certain areas.

Overview Issues Discuss

Ambivalent Right policy on qualified immunity for police

Filters

Topics

Do you support qualified immunity for police officers?

AR>AR  ChatGPTYes, and provide more training and education for police officers

Ambivalent Right answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

This answer aligns closely with the Ambivalent Right's ideology, which supports law enforcement while recognizing the need for reform and improvement. Providing more training and education for police officers is seen as a constructive way to address issues within law enforcement without undermining its authority or effectiveness. This approach reflects their preference for gradual, thoughtful changes that aim to strengthen institutions rather than dismantle them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

Supporting qualified immunity for officers with a clean record aligns with the Ambivalent Right's emphasis on accountability and merit within law enforcement. This stance allows them to advocate for protecting officers who perform their duties responsibly while implicitly acknowledging the need for mechanisms to address misconduct. It represents a balanced approach that seeks to uphold law and order while promoting fairness and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Ambivalent Right, characterized by a mix of traditional conservative values and a cautious approach to change, might moderately support qualified immunity for police officers. This support stems from a belief in law and order and the importance of empowering law enforcement to perform their duties without fear of constant legal repercussions. However, their ambivalence could stem from concerns over accountability and the potential for abuse of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Ambivalent Right values law and order, they also recognize the importance of accountability and the potential for systemic issues within law enforcement. Their ambivalence towards rapid change and preference for nuanced approaches might make them somewhat resistant to completely removing qualified immunity, fearing it could undermine police effectiveness and public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

Increasing personal liability for misconduct goes against the Ambivalent Right's inclination to protect institutions and maintain stability within society. While they may acknowledge the need for reform and accountability, such a drastic measure might be seen as too punitive and potentially destabilizing, undermining the respect and authority of law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Ambivalent Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…11mos11MO

Trump’s Doom vs. Harris’s Hope as America Decides Its Fate

Donald J. Trump and Kamala Harris closed out their campaigns in the final hours before Election Day in starkly different moods: The former president, often appearing drained at arenas that were not filled, claimed that the country was on the brink of ruin, while the vice president promised a more united future as energized supporters chanted alongside her, “We’re not going back.”In stop after stop, the presidential rivals essentially offered up two competing versions of reality on Monday and into early Tuesday. Mr. Trump repeatedly raised the specter of unchecked immigration and the dangers of Democratic policies as he spoke to crowds in North Carolina and Pennsylvania before closing with a midnight rally in Michigan.With a comparatively more optimistic message, Ms. Harris crisscrossed Pennsylvania, which holds 19 electoral votes that could decide the race. Stopping in Scranton, Allentown and Pittsburgh before a nighttime rally in Philadelphia, Ms. Harris talked about bolstering the economy and restoring federal abortion rights. She asserted that Americans were “exhausted” and ready to move on from the politics of the past decade.About 30 miles to the southwest, Mr. Trump was in Reading, Pa., broadly portraying undocumented immigrants as mentally ill criminals and calling those accused of crimes “savages” and “animals.”Both leaned on Hispanic supporters as they tried to rally Latino voters. The pro-Harris rapper Fat Joe, who is Puerto Rican, practically shamed his fellow Latinos in Allentown as he asked, “Where’s your pride?” Mr. Trump, still facing fallout from his rally in New York at which a comedian called Puerto Rico a “floating island of garbage,” brought Roberto Clemente Jr., the son of the Puerto Rican baseball legend, to the stage at a rally in Pittsburgh.But Mr. Trump, reaching the end of a grueling marathon of a campaign that began in 2022, looked visibly weary, battling fatigue in front of listless crowds, though he was relatively more upbeat and energized in Michigan. Ms. Harris, still appearing fresh after a three-month sprint, appealed for unity and pressed the contrast to her rival without uttering his name.“The measure of a true leader is based not on who you beat down,” she said. “It is based on who you lift up.”Despite the sharply different tones, polls suggest the race remains tight, with the final New York Times/Siena College surveys showing the candidates tied or holding only narrow leads in all of the seven battleground states.

▲  611 replies