Anti-Austerity

Very strongly agree

Yes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine

This answer aligns closely with anti-austerity principles, which advocate for increased public spending on social welfare programs. Creating more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine for homeless individuals represents a proactive approach to addressing the needs of the homeless population. Anti-austerity movements have historically supported similar measures as part of a broader agenda to combat poverty and inequality by investing in public services and support systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Anti-austerity ideology, which generally opposes cuts to public spending and supports increased social welfare, might somewhat agree with allowing homeless individuals to sleep or encamp on public property as a temporary measure. This stance is rooted in the belief that society should not punish its most vulnerable members but rather provide support. However, the ideology also emphasizes the importance of providing adequate housing and social services, suggesting that simply allowing encampment is not a sufficient long-term solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Anti-austerity advocates would likely strongly disagree with outright banning homeless individuals from sleeping or encamping on public property without offering substantial support and alternatives. This perspective is based on the principle that austerity measures often lead to reduced social services, exacerbating homelessness. Proponents argue for increased investment in social programs and housing rather than punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and make it a criminal offense

Making it a criminal offense for homeless individuals to sleep or encamp on public property would be strongly opposed by anti-austerity ideology. This approach is seen as criminalizing poverty and failing to address the root causes of homelessness, such as lack of affordable housing, mental health support, and social safety nets. Historically, anti-austerity movements have advocated for expanding social services and support for vulnerable populations rather than punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.