Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

4.3k Replies

 @9DD79J2Republican from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

 @999FH8WRepublican from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

 Deletedanswered…3wks3W

Yes, with strict conditions... Links expansion to energy independence, not export profit. Mandates simultaneous scaled investment in renewables, nuclear, and grid modernization. Implements uncompromising environmental safeguards, spill containment tech, and corporate liability enforcement. Incorporates adaptive off-ramps—ceasing expansion if clean energy milestones are met or environmental thresholds breached. Creates a sovereign reinvestment fund (modeled after Norway) that redirects offshore revenues into long-term sustainable infrastructure, innovation, and intergenerational equity.

 @HtindalRepublican  from Texas  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but continue to offer government subsidies for use of clean energy until we are able to ween off of the need for fossil fuels.

 @9TYL67LRepublican from New York  answered…10mos10MO

We should be drilling oil in our own country because then inflation will decrease and people will be able to buy grocceries normally again.

 @9TY8LC6Republican from Pennsylvania  answered…10mos10MO

yes, but only in areas where sea life is barren or empty when it comes to animal and species amount.

 @9TTD33CRepublican from Nebraska  answered…10mos10MO

if the expansion is in our territory and doesn't harm the natural environment and if its a bit restricted it should be ok

 @9MHJD6NRepublican from California  answered…1yr1Y

No, if it is done in nation then it can help increase America's GDP and help grow profits as a nation.

 @9MH8H4Wfrom Maine  answered…1yr1Y

No, but create incentives for alternative energy usage by oil companies and set slowly tightening limits on usage to 'phase out' oil.

 @9MCJJQX from Arizona  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but keep regulations active to ensure the safety of the workers and do not cause another “Deepwater horizon”

 @9MBR3DVRepublican from New Mexico  answered…1yr1Y

I think they should because it would decrease prices but be super careful here they go so they don't hurt the ocean because climate change is an issue too that everyone is worried about even thought we do stuff where it is our fault.

 @9M7D5W4Republican from Maine  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but regulate with common sense to provide work place safety, safe environment practices. Become more energy efficient.

 @9KFMJSS from West Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

Taking from the earth should be allowed if we give back jut as much. and take resources in a limited manner.

 @9KCW5V3Republican from Oklahoma  answered…1yr1Y

No, but offshore drilling already occurring should be reinforced and made more for environmental safety.

 @9KCFVT8 from Illinois  answered…1yr1Y

I will say bot yes, no . the reason is oil are expensive and it can change the country but if we do more for that we have to loss habitat ( living space).

 @9KBS78R from Louisiana  answered…1yr1Y

I say that it's both yes and no because it might lead to the Diggers(Drillers/Miners) to find something very important and mistakenly breaking are disrupting it.

 @9KBDGFCRepublican from Missouri  answered…1yr1Y

No, and put more regulations in place to prevent disasters like oil spills while maintaining our current oil wells.

 @9JP6C2CRepublican from Iowa  answered…1yr1Y

The us needs to be oil independent so that we do not have to rely on other countries for oil. If we need to expand offshore drilling to do so, then yes.

 @9JJQ6Z7Republican from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

I don't think the US should be dependent on other countries for oil, but I believe that the US should spread out their offshore oil rigs, and equally use them less.

 @9JFFB9G from New Jersey  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, continue it but once we come into and disagreements with other countries in their territory, we shall obey their requests and shut down operations in that drilling site.

 @9J8R6YBRepublican  from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

Let that be a market decision after the negative externalities are priced into oil through increased taxes and fees on consumers and extractors

 @9J62J5S from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the gas/chemicals are natural and it would lower gas prices tremendously because we are drilling within our land.

 @9J2B6WV from California  answered…2yrs2Y

depends on the impact of that specific oil well. I support one that provides oil with the least impact on the enviorment

 @9HNYLY2Republican from Massachusetts  answered…2yrs2Y

No because if you expand the offshore oil drilling that means your displacing animals that have an environment that is unique to others.

 @9HLB64VRepublican from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

We have lots of oil on land that we can drill but have been shut down because it "ruins the environment", which is true. But if that's really why those drilling spots were stopped, why are we buying oil from countries like Russia? Which by the way which is the direct opponent of the Ukraine, who we are sending various military supplies to to beat russia, which seems to backwards to me.

 @9HGDB5Z from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

this is a yes and no question because its only needed if we are running low on oil but the no side would be because it could possiibly or most likely damage the climate even more.

 @9HDXKD2Republican from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

I think that we should work to find alternative energy production, but in that time we maintain our current offshore oil wells safely.

 @9FTG3ZFRepublican  from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but promote cleaning resources to keep as much excess oil out of the oceans. Oil production is important to our energy resources in America

 @9HB35PPRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

no not until they open the south Dakota line back put off shore drilling cost more and and if we open the SD line it would be cheaper and easier.

 @9H9C83MRepublican from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but pay the foreign countries less, all that money goes to a few families and they don’t help out their country at all.

 @9H2HCZQRepublican from Nebraska  answered…2yrs2Y

No, and close down those that are affecting the natural ecosystem. Some may remain in preserved areas.

 @9GZBJL8Republican from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

No, we should try to expand our nations oil drilling just in case we cut ties with the countries we do the business with

 @9GYYD8KRepublican from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

yes and no yes becuase we dont want to have to rely on other countires for supplys and also no becuase we will run out faster and worst for the earth.

 @9GWG64WRepublican from Alaska  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as they follow all environmental regulations and pay what debt they owe if things go wrong.

 @9D84D5BRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, until the electrical infrastructre has been upgraded and secured, plus the addtion of more reliable and renewable sources are added.

 @9CLL7TQ from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BY6QSDIndependent from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and simultaneously build the proper infostructure for renewable energy. We are not ready to abandon fossil fuels.

 @9BHLMF9Republican from Ohio  answered…2yrs2Y

 @997QT5R from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @95CH6QQRepublican from Oklahoma  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes and no make regulations for oil drilling and provide alternative energy production

 @93X985SRepublican from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93WC5PGRepublican from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

No, the US should use our own resources first to remain energy independent

 @93L82JYRepublican from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but have strict environmental regulations and attempt to get access to renewable energy as well

 @93JQFWF from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes to lower high gas prices and that could create revenue for the country by selling oil

 @93CC48QRepublican from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @932L7F4Republican from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZW9ZJY from Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZN2KL4 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @maxfern414Republicanfrom Massachusetts  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Z8GG67 from Indiana  answered…3yrs3Y

This depends on legitimate need to the country, if we need it yes, if not no.

 @8H7DQVCRepublican from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but allow states to decide whether they wish to expand or ban drilling.

 @8YK6NPRRepublican from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

No, we should transition to more nuclear and sustainable energy sources.

 @8YBWV59 from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but increase oversight and prevention of oil spills when it expands

 @8Y3F7RXRepublican from Idaho  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XSS546 from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but Offshore Drilling should be strictly regulated and banned in Environmentally sensitive areas and Major Touristic attractions by the shore.

 @8X83JWKRepublican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8X83JWKRepublican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WXSZ9FRepublican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but drastically increase the fines a company must pay when a accident occurs.

 @Avas18Republican from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @EthanSeanFriedman9Republican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TY2VD2Republican from North Dakota  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but with the exception of the environment and species living there

 @8TQCZZTRepublican from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if it can be done safely, such as advancements in the technology to prevent another Deepwater Horizon incident.

 @8TM7GNFRepublican from Oklahoma  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but with oversight and ability to respond to a possible oil spill in the area.

 @8T8M6LQRepublican from South Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if they do it in a safe way that is non harmful to the environment

 @8T823ZLRepublican from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, because it makes gas cheaper; but stop if it kills nature or harms wildlife.

 @8SVJY89Republican from Missouri  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SVC468Republican from Texas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but maintain our current offshore oil wells and also deregulate the energy sector to let the free market determine the best energy sources.

 @8SVBJPK from Kansas  answered…4yrs4Y

If there is more need for jobs, yes, until we can start going nuclear until we can find a better solution.

 @8STRDTDRepublican from Oklahoma  answered…4yrs4Y

yes, but it should all be owned by the us the land the mine and the revenue

 @EthanSeanFriedman9Republican from New Jersey  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8SKT3L8Republican from Delaware  answered…4yrs4Y

No, because it would be at the expense of causing damage to the ocean if it does cause damage, and going into other territories or relying on other territories owners. And we should really start putting more effort and incentives towards sustainable energy while only using oil for the necessitates.

 @8S78BX8Republican from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

We should use more of our own oil it's cheaper and if you think about it it is safer for the environment because we won't have super tankers carrying tons of oil across the ocean.

 @8RYGTTSRepublican from Alaska  answered…4yrs4Y

They should expand only if they aren't getting enough oil where they are drilling

 @8RYB2G5 from Alabama  answered…4yrs4Y

We should, but we should be aware of oil spill dangers and be extremely careful.

 @8RX2YJL from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

They should increase per our needs, but decrease as green energy becomes cheaper and more efficient.

 @8RTY48WConstitution from Ohio  answered…4yrs4Y

Expand just enough to make us energy independent and then slowly decrease as we become more green energy based

 @8RTVNSQRepublican from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RTQTYR from Washington  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RSL3VC from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but make it safer by adding a water and oil filter bordering the drilling site all the way to the bottom of the seafloor.

 @8RS36QC from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...