Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

4.2k Replies

 @9S2PDWW from Virginia  answered…12mos12MO

The United States should remain in the United Nations, as a symbol to the world, and we should if possible contributes to United Nations peacekeeping missions. But we must also remember that the United States has its own interest that can sometimes conflate with the UN agenda, and we must be ready to stand our ground against the UN if the They should ever come that it becomes hostile to the United States.

 @9ZRG8TB from Virginia  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, and more should be done to also prevent the power the US (and any one country) has to block ceasefire and investigation into genocide, including arrest of war criminals.

 @9XPWJJ6 from Virginia  answered…9mos9MO

Yes but the other nations should continue to keep up there part of the deal or else we should pull out

 @Ravencrest48 from Virginia  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but the United Nations should take the place of the United States in its involvement in funding and defense of foreign nations.

 @9TBZS5P from Virginia  answered…11mos11MO

Yes. Allow the UN to handle conflicts between other countries and spend our money in our own country

 @9SLXSRRIndependent from Virginia  answered…11mos11MO

No, unless it’s role and influence is scaled back appropriately and it only serves in an advisory position and funding is commiserate with each member’s ability to pay.

 @9R3GMSH from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, because the U.N. can sometimes be a useful symbolic propaganda venue, but is generally useless.

 @9LQ7RB2 from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but we need to quit spending so much money in other nations and try focusing on our own country or vets.

 @9KFSKNS from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

No, the United Nations should be among the European countries that it mostly encompasses, while the U.S. could join a different league able to protect the western part of the world.

 @9JVF5NC from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

Yes and no only when a true ally that we trade with and associate with is in danger or trouoble if not leave us out

 @9FKTWWBSocialist from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F2KKMM from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

The U.S. should remain as a member, however, there should be more involvement in being humanitarian aids.

 @9DVGVXX from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but we should not be subject to the whims and demands of other nations.

 @9DP998F from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but reduce foreign involvement on a military level unless Human rights are violated by an individual third party/entity

 @9DL4DNM  from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but pass legislation in the U.N. that removes communist or fascist countries from the organization and especially the U.N. Security Council.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

We need to stay in the U.N. but focus power on how much people actually spend in that area. We should also use it not as a tool for american ideals, but as a way to lift nations up and become strong allies rather than enemies. It'll have heavy benefits for all nations that strive to be heavily involved, and will provide resources to countries that want a stake in the world the same way we do. IT's got lots of possible ability but it's use is not in the interest of humankind.

 @99VDHH8Progressive from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

the U.S military should be democratized into the UN Peacekeeping force, acting as a bullwark of democracy and human rights.

 @99JQZBF from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

We, as a country should stand united with those who are our allies, though that does not mean we have to fight in all of their battles for them.

 @99D9X3M from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @92NLKFMLibertarian from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes we should stay in, but the UN needs reformation. No one on the Security Council should have veto power. The UN charter needs to be enforced, and UN troops need to be sent in whenever civilian populations are endangered. The UN needs to promote in a more agressive manner, peaceful resolutions of international disputes, and it should sanction any nation that invades another nation. All nations should be subject to the World Court, and any Nation committing atrocities needs to be tried in the World COurt.

 @8Z2XTXN from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Y6KKYSProgressive from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if the UN enforces international law and doesn't allow moneyed interests to take over.

 @8X242Y5 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WZ6WJH from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

U.D.N. = "United Democratic Nations" only invite nations that employ a democratic system of government? The U.N. is an organization of governments founded in 1945 after World War II. The organization's objectives include promoting peace and security, protecting human rights and the environment and providing humanitarian aid in cases of famine, natural disaster, and armed conflict. Recent U.N. interventions include the Sri Lankan civil war in 2009 and the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. The U.S. joined the U.N. as a founding member in 1945. The U.S. is the largest financial contributor to the UN and contributes more than $650 million annually.

 @8WSVFNH from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WRH64Y from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

The UN is overall an ineffective body and has no actual power to regulate the actions of countries, however it is still somewhat beneficial for the US to remain involved.

 @8WM3VGX from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but add more pressure to the U.N. to uphold their end of the bargain (most countries fall behind in one area or another). With potential deadlines which once hit will receive some kind of consequence from the U.S.

 @8WLZHWH from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WCZXLYLibertarian from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

The UN should remain in the UN, but the UN has no right in dictating our laws / actions. Until the UN becomes the world Government, we have enough to deal with here.

 @8WCH4N4 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WBSJMBRepublican from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only if the institution of the UN is reformed and remodeled to reflect current global realities rather than the outmoded norms of the cold war era (particularly a reapportionment of the security council and the way power is wielded within the entire UN body).

 @8W6H9LC from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8W4VDQLCommunist from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

I think that the United Nations needs to be better at their job of protecting the peace and people.

 @8VZ2PC3 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8VVQWDL from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, until a fairer representation is reached our involvement should be limited.

 @8VTKHVJ from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TXL77WAmerican from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TQ9CJ4 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TM66D5 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T7RT69Republican from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only to effect our national interest and combat our adversaries around the world.

 @8T7QKSZ from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests, but scale back our annual contributions while other countries increase theirs because the U.S. is stretched financially.

 @8T5VXY3 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes. But each country pays an equal share. If this is not met in 1 year, US should withdraw. No single country should be ponying up more than another country in terms of resources, money, etc. This helps to ensure each has an equal voice.

 @8SRZ9JGAmerican Solidarity from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

We should withdraw from the UN, give New York City to it, and then fire bomb that hell hole till it's dust.

 @8SRNLKR from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

I agree with user @5RX7VY4: "Donald Trump is correct. We need to renegotiate our affiliation with both the UN and NATO. If they cannot begin to provide funding for their own operations, then they need to go. The US has become their funding for anything they choose to do and America is fed up paying for their nonsense. We either need to have more control over what they choose to do or they need to get other countries to pay for it!"

 @8SR5T7NRepublican from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and punish malicious foreign powers that are taking advantage of the structure like China and Iran are currently with the human and women's rights councils.

 @8S8XSCFGreen from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

In all honesty, I don't have enough knowledge on the matter, in my opinion, to properly access the reason to leave or remain in the United Nations, therefore, I'd like to skip this.

 @8S5GTV9 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

The US should remain part but we shouldn’t have to pay for other countries problems

 @8RWRXCD from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RCNY3WLibertarian from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QSS353 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but require other nations to step up their funding, military support, etc

 @8PFZF68 from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8P9GJHZ from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8NRCYSBLibertarian from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8LQ3DJ5 from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8KSHXBZ from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but make other countries participate more in peace keeping efforts

 @8JLCZ4R from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8JJHF8CDemocrat from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8GGNZJG from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

I feel like it is good for security however, I feel like we need alliances with other countries in case of a emergency.

 @8F5KSGP from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but we should be able to abstain from involvement in resolutions that will have negligible effect for the US

 @9BJZP9F from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BBYY83 from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but the international security committee rules should be changed so we dont have so much power.

 @9B585CM from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and give legitimacy to the organization by ceasing violations of international law and further cooperating with international entities

 @99W48Q5Republican from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @98MFYS8Republican from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @98LTFF6 from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8WX2B45 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Mixed feelings. I support active interaction with other countries, including through the UN. I also recognize the UN is not a neutral forum for the free exchange of ideas and many of its stances are antithetical to the concept of individual liberty.

 @8WCF9S3 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if all those in the UN are contributing and the UN is equal in it's handling of issues.

 @8L7STB6 from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

 @9B2ZVXFNatural Law from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8T3FSH8 from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and No, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. but scale back our current involvement

 @iknowhowtospellcalm from Virginia  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but scale back our current involvement after reforming the security council. We must ensure our actions are more multi-lateral.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...