Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

20.2k Replies

 @9D6GQGHRepublican from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes. No mandatory penalty. Import Pharmaceuticals from other countries.

 @S3curityLucyGreenfrom California  agreed…2yrs2Y

Absolutely agree! Importing pharmaceuticals can potentially reduce drug prices significantly. For instance, Canadian drug prices are often much lower due to their national health system's bargaining power. Should the U.S. consider policies similar to Canada's to combat high pharmaceutical prices?

 @9D6V4WXRepublican  from Alabama  answered…2yrs2Y

No. Employers should be required to cover health insurance premiums for their employees and their dependents and HSAs should be allowed alongside all health insurance plans, but set the annual maximum contribution limit equal to the out of pocket maximum.

 @8KRNMFKRepublican from Minnesota  answered…5yrs5Y

Healthcare shouldn’t be this expensive in the first place! No, I do not support Obamacare, I do support helping people with preexisting conditions however.

 @9DD79J2Republican from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

I support the idea but I don't think government intervention is the way to achieve such a goal.

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican  from Maryland  answered…2mos2MO

No, I support protections for people with pre-existing conditions from being denied coverage, but I am strongly against birth control or contraceptives especially if it's free

 @9ZHR8P6Republican from California  answered…8mos8MO

I support the majority of the plan but instead should open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs as well as not fining people for not having insurance.

 @9ZG9XC5Republican  from New Jersey  answered…8mos8MO

Medicare, insurance, Obamacare, all of it inflates false prices. The system needs a whole rewrite. Long lines don’t serve the American people and neither do long bills.

 @9YHG98NRepublican from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

only for families trying to make ends meat and trying to make a better life for themselves and their kids

 @9XYKBQTRepublican from Florida  answered…8mos8MO

The government should be involved in healthcare only for funding American from low income families and classes

 @9XTTLH6Republican from Iowa  answered…8mos8MO

Obama care doesnt do us any good we need trumps plan on Affordable care act ,make it more affordable

 @9X83RTT from Ohio  answered…8mos8MO

Providers should compete for the national plan, with criteria to select the optimal provider based on cost and coverage. Competition should be annual. Open market to encourage competition.

 @9WS2XYWRepublican from Texas  answered…9mos9MO

I don't think its relevant for national government to get involved just let state and local governments worry about their own situation.

 @9WPPBVFRepublican from South Carolina  answered…9mos9MO

obamacare is good but its not fair for people who pay their health care and health insurance when they see people get free health care because of Obama care. everybody pays it themselves or the government pays it for everybody

 @9WKJRWKRepublican from Virginia  answered…9mos9MO

have a free market, but the government can compensate for people struggling to afford healthcare for essential issues.

 @9WGBZRB from Nebraska  answered…9mos9MO

No, a new system needs to be figured out, Obamacare and ACA are expensive and not accepted by many healthcare companies.

 @9W93X7LRepublican from Ohio  answered…9mos9MO

If the government is here to protect U.S. citizens, then they should make healthcare accessible to all citizens

 @9W526NN from Pennsylvania  answered…9mos9MO

I support the extension of the age to be on parents plan to 26 and some other aspects, but think there could be a better way to give people options outside of it.

 @9W2HV7YRepublican from Illinois  answered…9mos9MO

The current healthcare has its good points about pre existing, But can you imagine what the price of automobiles, houses etc would be if we could only buy them 60 days per year, this should be open all year, and why is my county only selling HMO. What a freaking mess

 @9VLN8H8 from Montana  answered…9mos9MO

No because people who illegally cross the border that use drugs doi not deserve what people who lost their job due to inflation.

 @9VF7CN3Republican from Texas  answered…9mos9MO

the ACA´s future remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about its effectiveness and the potential for reform

 @9VBNXWTRepublican from Texas  answered…9mos9MO

making hospital bills overall more realistic whenever it comes to the pricing of the bills they send out for things like tylonyl which gets charged upwards of 40$ for one pill which is obserd

 @9V49RZ6Republican from Missouri  answered…10mos10MO

He could highlight the need for a health care system that serves all citizens and promotes public welfare.

 @9V2KZ4SRepublican from North Carolina  answered…10mos10MO

the coverage within these plans make no difference. My sister has government provided health care as she is a college student and pays more money for things then she did before having insurance.

 @9TW4JNVRepublican from Idaho  answered…10mos10MO

We need to address the costs of healthcare so we can afford healthcare without the help of the government

 @9TNXKJ5Republican from Illinois  answered…10mos10MO

no Obama care is genuinely a good concept its main flaw is how expensive it is with the taxes rising because of it

 @9TMGL46Republican from Virginia  answered…10mos10MO

I support not denying coverage to some conditions and children who do not have coverage from their families

 @9TLT2B3Republican from Oregon  answered…10mos10MO

Able-bodied people should be allowed to make their own healthcare decisions and be Strongly incented To buy private insurance. People not able to buy their own insurance or make their own health decisions should be taken care of on a local level. This would be a definite transition process. This is the process we should be thinking about because if we let the Democrats continue in power, Medicare and Medicaid will be bankrupt as well as Social Security.

 @9TJ3322Republican from South Carolina  answered…10mos10MO

need open access to pricing need to convert to a "general contractor" model when visiting a hospital / HC provider - i don't want 6 bills for one visit

 @9TFRCFZRepublican from Oklahoma  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects. Insurance plans should cover medical needs across state lines. We need a stricter FDA to remove harmful chemicals from food that are banned in other countries.

 @9TF5TQNRepublican from Wyoming  answered…10mos10MO

I support a majority of the plan, however "The act grants the government SIGNIFICANT REGULATORY POWERS..." that coupled with the fine clause, even though it was overturned later, makes this statute a greater burden on the people while simultaneously giving the federal government more power. I strongly disagree with that.

 @9T4F9Y5Republican from Arizona  answered…10mos10MO

I believe in it, but I think they should restrict the amount of coverage to save money and limit government spending so they can spend the money on more important issues.

 @9T3T6BMRepublican from Nebraska  answered…10mos10MO

I think people should spy for their own health care and not have people who do have money be paying for other people health care through taxes

 @9SPMDKF from North Carolina  answered…11mos11MO

No. It was a massive failure that not only provided low-quality health care, but also drove up the prices of healthcare.

 @9SKXYN4Republican  from Maryland  answered…11mos11MO

Again, I do not think that government intervention when it comes to the wellbeing of nearly 400 million people is the most effective way to better the overall health of our nation. The United States should focus less on throwing more money at programs and more about the messaging that we send to our citizens in terms of the choices they can make when it comes to preserving their own health. By my own logic, there is only so much the government can do when it comes to implementing a positive, unified message to our nation about making good choices when so many bad choices are available. That type of development begins in the home—a place on which I believe the government should have the least amount of impact.

 @9S4RXWSRepublican from New Hampshire  answered…11mos11MO

In order to have a Universal Health Care System, we have to address the run away costs in our health care system first.

 @9S36LHS from Delaware  answered…11mos11MO

There are bad parts of Obamacare but it has given more Americans health coverage and made health care more affordable. I would only support Obamacare if one could come up with a alternative real health care and replacement plan. I’m okay with cutting costs for medicine but we can’t just have cancer be the main cause of U. S. bankruptcy. If the government loaned people money for health care and ensured all citizens had health coverage, that would be a great option. As I said, I do not support repealing the ACA without a replacement plan.

 @9S2TFY6 from Virginia  answered…11mos11MO

No, but I do support legislation that would prevent insurance companies from colluding with hospitals and mandatory publication of hospital pricing.

 @9RPWHH6Republican from South Carolina  answered…11mos11MO

I support some aspects, but not all. We need to learn from other countries and also learn from our own prior attempts at providing adequate health care and pick and choose the best practices that could apply. Take the party fighting out of those discussions - this should not be a republican vs democrat thing...

 @9R2S2L6 from Missouri  answered…12mos12MO

Only to a certain degree but the government should not be involved in healthcare and should start weaning off its control.

 @9PHXYZPRepublican from California  answered…1yr1Y

No. Make legislation to allow private insurance companies to market nationally, without preexisting requirements. Also, allow companies to provide low cost catastrophic insurance plans to young healthy members.

 @9NX7MXWRepublican from California  answered…1yr1Y

This is situational. If one puts oneself in a low-income state, one should have no support since it was their fault. If one immigrated to the US or was put into a low-income situation that wasn't by or in one's will, they should be able to get help.

 @9NNVM73Republican from California  answered…1yr1Y

No, I support some aspects of the plan but believe it should be amended due to astronomical spending, increased taxes, lower quality of care, and how it economically punishes individuals who can't afford insurance.

 @9N4YP57Republican from Oregon  answered…1yr1Y

no, there are many ways the country could put in place programs to ensure the health and safety of citizens, but I believe that it isn't their job to worry about their own safety and that the government should stay out of the insurance market.

 @9MSBFY8Republican from Pennsylvania  answered…1yr1Y

Kinda it's good and great for health and wealth and acts as a security net for americans but it is flawed because you might have to wait or pay a lot in taxes.

 @9M7677X from Mississippi  answered…1yr1Y

Obamacare allowed me to get insurance when I did not qualify for private insurance, however, it was so expensive that I could only afford it for three months.

 @9M3YSKV from Kansas  answered…1yr1Y

It is a yes and no because it is helpful but not for everyone. Certain groups of the public would disagree and some will agree this is bias everywhere you go when certain things like this are discussed.

 @9LMYTQ6Republican from Ohio  answered…1yr1Y

The affordable care act has not worked out as anticipated. Again, it’s another large government idea found it in a good place Without the ability to succeeded. At present, the amount of money that is paid to providers from this insurance company is below Medicaid levels. Consequently, no providers take or provide care for this insurance.

 @9LJX9YLRepublican  from Missouri  answered…1yr1Y

No, They should restrict the insurance companies from denying medical care procedures and prescriptions that is reasonable based on diagnosis. As well limiting the cost the insurance companies can charge

 @9LJ48CYRepublican from Indiana  answered…1yr1Y

I dont believe that insurance companies should exist as private corporations I believe that health insurance should be provided by the government not private party scammers that do as much as they can not to pay

 @9LFS7R9Republicananswered…1yr1Y

no, some aspects I agree with, but the execution was not as properly thought out as it could have been.

 @9KZNDDTRepublican from Georgia  answered…1yr1Y

i think people who don't want to work shouldn't but if someone is working and trying there best and still strugging then yes

 @9K53PJDRepublican from Maryland  answered…1yr1Y

We are funding the government...They should give us something like health care if we are getting taxed.

 @9K26HFPRepublican from Michigan  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only for people who absolutely cannot work due to health problems whether physical or mental.

 @9JWV4MLRepublican from Georgia  answered…1yr1Y

No, we need to limit governments involvement with healthcare and I do not support socialized medicine or single payer healthcare!

 @9JHWRY2Republican from Indiana  answered…1yr1Y

Yes if the government still requires you to have healthcare, and if they don't require it then obamacare shouldn't be supported.

 @9J6WL7R from Indiana  answered…1yr1Y

No, I think healthcare offices should offer payment plans and work with patients on what they can and cannot afford.

 @9J4Q294Republican  from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Absolutely not. The fines i owe fir being unable to afford should be removed frim my irs bill. What a travesty.

 @9HYYJB6Republican from Nevada  answered…1yr1Y

I feel stuck in between. There are multiple pros and cons, and I don't always agree with the actions needed for Obamacare.

 @9HN6LKZ from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should not be allowed to raise taxes for medicaid. If they really wish so, they can hold a fundraiser.

 @9D6V4WXRepublican  from Alabama  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but employers should be required to cover the cost of health insurance premiums for employees and their families.

 @9H9J8S6  from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

I do not support it and the reason why is from what I read, when Obamacare went live it caused $1.2 trillion dollars in national debt. I understand that free health care is important but this obviously isnt the way to implement it into our country if it is causing so much debt.

 @9GWTMNPRepublican from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

I think healthcare should be affordable to everyone, not just the rich. When ObamaCare first came out I could not afford it. I did not have Health Insurance that entire year, so when I received my Federal taxes, the following spring I was penalized, and they took almost $1000.00 from me because of that. How is that helping the working class people?

 @9GVXSRWRepublican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

I think the intentions are good, but people take advantage of it and that is not right, which can create a failure for the program.

 @9GVC9S5Republican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

People should be encouraged to pay for it themselves, there should be a form of limit until they have to pay for it themselves

 @9GTPWXP from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

No, healthcare is not stated in our Constitution thus should not be a part of the Federal Government's jurisdiction of power.

 @9GSV5XFRepublicananswered…2yrs2Y

Obamacare is fake its a whole scandle and he took money from peoples pockets without them knowing robbing them blind thinking they getting something in return

 @9GQ8T5M from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

I think private healthcare is entirely too expensive, but I think it should be more of a mix between private and government based healthcare.

 @9GLVF98Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Was taught about this later on and I am still not 100 percent sure about everything it has to offer so I will not answer

 @9GKV8GBRepublican from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

I support some of the plan but it heavily taxes the average person every month and the average person can't continuously pay money to help poor people.

 @9GKKHQ2Republican from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

I feel as though it is important to a lot of people who can't afford or can't get insurance, but not important to me personally.

 @9GK7RTZRepublican  from Connecticut  answered…2yrs2Y

Heakthcare will continue to bankrupt people unless the costs controlled. THe lobbyists are the enemy. ANd pharma is too.

 @9GG26V6Republican  from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

i mean i like to not pay more on taxes to pay for the people that are poor. but overall not really. if we just keep making it more comfortable for the poor people than its just gonna be easy to be lazy.

 @9FP26TZRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

I agree with free healthcare for the poor, but this is taking too much money from the government and should be managed better

 @9FKR2NLRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9FHCK4WRepublican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only the part that prevents insurance companies from denying coverage to people with preexisting conditions.

 @9FFYQ6HRepublican from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9FDSTVNRepublican from Nevada  answered…2yrs2Y

No, some aspects are good ideas. But it involves too much mismanagement and bureaucracy.

 @9FDCVY9 from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9FCFS7WRepublican from Alabama  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9FBLT4G from Ohio  answered…2yrs2Y

I don't really have an opinion on this because i do not know enough about it to give a true opinion

 @9F8YF6QRepublican from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F4DDXBRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

I do not support it because its not really good even though its affordable. If we were able to implement a better system maybe I would reconsider.

 @9DZJHRN from California  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DZ9R43Republican from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

no, forcing everyone to pay for obama care is stupid. I like the idea but the way it was implemented wrong.

 @9DYJGPYRepublican from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DY2BBJRepublican from California  answered…2yrs2Y

No, government should regulate fair afordable prices for medications and treatments

 @9DWXDR4Republican from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

No, all should be cared for how bad their condition is and shouldn't worry about taxes or costs.

 @9DWKLBPRepublican from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

We need a private insurance and public universal insurance and have them compete in the free market

 @9DS8WQ6 from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DQCHKKRepublican from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DQ9V9KRepublican from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

At this point in time Obamacare is too engrained into the healthcare system to abolish.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...