Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

20.2k Replies

 @9ZBHJWD from New York  answered…8mos8MO

Government could have a standard non-profilt service that is minimal and bare bones, and all others are allowed to freely compete.

 @9D7ZYBG from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

 @97SR8WD from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes. And a medical device tax should be imposed. Mental heath should not be covered. Alcoholics and cigarette smokers should qualify for food stamps.

 @95TS4SSDemocrat from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @95LDR5Y from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @958TZF6Libertarian from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

No the federal government should not be involved in anything other than defense.

 @9578X9W from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @935RM56 from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and allow pharmaceuticals to be imported

 @92NS67P from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

No, it’s just enabling what was already a scam system to continue existing by the government propping up its legitimacy. It’s a band-aid over a bullet hole.

 @8ZQJJQB from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YTVYX7Independent from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

The Government should provide a low cost option that covers very basic needs. It should be priced to compete with the lowest coverage offered by insurers.

 @8YRRRDF from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

not everything should be for free and handed to certain people because someone people could be using certain medications for drugs.

 @8YLB7YKIndependent from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

No, Private insurance should be replaced with a Universal Health Care system

 @8Y3JLXF from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8Y2NB8J from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Provide a universal free healthcare for all but have premium tiers you can purchase for better healthcare

 @8X5D2LR from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

No, I do not believe that the government should just give healthcare away because it hurts the other healthcare companies that are not giving it away for free and does not make people actually have to try to get it.

 @8X4HQMM from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes and no. It is still too expensive for me to afford. Otherwise I don't mind it

 @8WXVNL6 from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but I support a single payer system with an elective private option

 @8RQXD4TGreen from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8R6QT8D from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PZ3JBC from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8MS85BCDemocrat from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

I do not support Obamacare, but it should not be revoked until a new or better plan is in place to replace it

 @8LD9DG7 from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects. Like any first iteration of a plan, there's always room to improve and enhance for the better of the American people.

 @8JQQ42J from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8JKBBXL from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Everyone should have the same health care benefits no matter age or wages

 @8JG5LQKIndependent from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8J9WKZN from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8J535BZ from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8HZKDGW from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Govt paid healthcare for all seniors above the age of 60. ALL CARE NEEDED The rest is private.

 @8FKP3XB from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Free healthcare for all with freedom to choose providers and source of medicines

 @8DDSCNFWomen’s Equality from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

ACA only benefits non working people. Everyone who works has been impacted as insurance rates have gone up to cover expenses of non workers.

 @8D73WNC from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

 @8D35C8Y from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

no because this eliminates doctors to strive to be a great doctor if they will all end up being paid the same. I believe everyone should have access to health care but believe in finding an alternative (from Obama Care) to achieve this.

 @9B6TX4WIndependent from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

The federal government should adopt a free universal health care system

 @jjkaiser166Independent from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

The Mandate for individual and small businesses along with a ban on interstate sale of insurance is what I oppose and those points should be permanently reversed . We need to have a smarter system that takes into account everyone's wealth and subsidize what is necessary to reduce out of pocket costs.

 @98YLDTT from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

 @98WBFQS from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

 @98T94GX from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

 @98R7486 from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

I would need to do more substantial research into Obamacare to develop a mature decision, however I do agree with the government giving some benefits and requiring states to give some. I also think the church should be helping people more than the government.

 @98LT6KB from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

I think support for Affordable care for people that have served in the military, have worked for their whole life and have retired and are working and maintaining their job should be able to get help with get medical care and have medical coverage. But people who have not worked their whole lives, refuse to work or have never worked cause they don't want to then I think that they should not be able to get help with medical coverage from the government.

 @98GKJN7 from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @97XHRB4 from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

It should be available, but insurance shouldn’t be mandatory to have.

 @96XNQMJ from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

No, did not go far enough to provide benefits of universal healthcare yet went far enough to bring the cons of such a system while removing benefits of a privatized system

 @92N2PF8 from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZHXHVJ from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

All children under the age of 16 should have dental insurance coverage provided by their parent's private insurance company or medicaid if the private company refuses to cooperate.

 @8ZCL3WQ from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

No universal health care is not a good thing and the current system covers the poor and indigent.

 @8J68VGXDemocrat from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Obamacare was expensive. People who could not afford healthcare were penalized if unable to afford it when claiming taxes and the healthcare wasn’t affordable enough to force people to have it

 @8HFHBDZ from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

I agree with it, however I think it is a first step in the longer process. The way I see this working is that with the next president, we will build upon Obamacare to get a strong well developed public option. However, the goal of this public option is to reach a high % of Americans as participants. Once that higher % is reached and we are sure our public system can handle all 300+ million Americans, then we can proceed with a complete public option that covers everyone's basic needs, with the option to purchase 'more' healthcare items which are not life-related, but cosmetic, such as a nose job.

 @99MMBLV from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

 @8Y6MCTX from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...