Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

20.2k Replies

 @8R8K9L5American Solidarity from Connecticut  answered…4yrs4Y

I support the plan, however, private healthcare should at the same time be an option for those who can afford high quality medical care.

 @9DWVL8SAmerican Solidarityfrom Guam  answered…2yrs2Y

No, remove the requirement that employers provide health insurance to their employees.

 @9ZB4YKNAmerican Solidarity from Kentucky  answered…8mos8MO

No. People and businesses should be able to include and exclude what they want to cover in their insurance.

 @9PZ2CCKAmerican Solidarity from South Dakota  answered…1yr1Y

No, but I would support it if it didn't force coverage for abortion for institutions that conscientiously object to the practice.

 @9PR8T4CAmerican Solidarity from Connecticut  answered…1yr1Y

Yes; however, I would prefer the United States implement an universal Bismarck model like many European countries or a hybrid Breveridge model like Australia

 @9L97F24American Solidarity from New York  answered…1yr1Y

Like I said everyone should have all parts of healthcare but if something better comes along that should replace Obamacare.

  @BullMooseQuakerAmerican Solidarity  from Kentucky  answered…1yr1Y

No, I support the concept, but requiring recipients to have private insurance for those who can't afford good insurance is immoral.

 @9GW8G3FAmerican Solidarityfrom Maine  answered…2yrs2Y

Healthcare should be government owned and have government funding put into it for robustness and effeciency, however, private healthcare companies should exist and those above a certain pay grade should be legally forced to use them to relieve strain on the public sector.

 @9BXMXGMAmerican Solidarity from Alabama  answered…2yrs2Y

Some of the act is good; other parts are not. Markets should be open across state lines

 @9BN6Y6RAmerican Solidarity from Connecticut  answered…2yrs2Y

As it stands, no; from what I've read, the original proposal was better and would have introduced much needed competition into the insurance industry

 @92YL8LVAmerican Solidarityfrom Montana  answered…3yrs3Y

 @7F2MM2FAmerican Solidarity from New York  answered…4yrs4Y

No, a single payer healthcare system would be better than a mandate system

 @8WWTW33American Solidarity from Arkansas  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, because it can help those in need but no because it also makes it harder for those who have the money for it to get a better insurance

 @8TLQTFSAmerican Solidarity from West Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TDSF4TAmerican Solidarity from Kentucky  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8RP9QNHAmerican Solidarity from Colorado  answered…4yrs4Y

In principle, I am not opposed to a publicly funded medical access; however, I believe that abortion and birth control should be made illegal under any circumstance (and thus not be funded by this action).

 @Biblical89American Solidarity from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects & I support a single payer system as well. No contraceptive mandate with the ACA as well to allow for religious liberty.

 @848VLCXAmerican Solidarity from Maryland  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but keep it in place until a single payer system can be established

 @8PKN7GZAmerican Solidarity from New York  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, only if it contains the Stupak language preventing taxpayer funded abortions

 @Biblical89American Solidarity from California  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects & I support a mandatory single payer system as well. No contraceptive mandate with the ACA as well to allow for religious liberty.

 @8N6BMTKAmerican Solidarity from Minnesota  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, but an optional public option would introduce reduced costs while not being mandatory.

 @8J3S3NWAmerican Solidarity from Massachusetts  answered…5yrs5Y

I support much of it as better than what was before, but the mandate is unconstitutional, and a single-payer option for healthcare is a better policy

 @8GC5LQZAmerican Solidarity from Iowa  answered…5yrs5Y

no but common sense laws against things like preexisting conditions should be passed.

 @8G59F7QAmerican Solidarity from Kansas  answered…5yrs5Y

No, but there should be expansions to Medicare and Medicaid to help those who fall through the cracks of the ACA

 @8CGSQG8American Solidarity from Alabama  answered…5yrs5Y

The government should regulate the insurance companies and require easily accessed pricing. No more special pricing that cash payers don’t receive.

 @9CMXGYZAmerican Solidarity from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, I support some of the plan but not all aspects. Also, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs. State universal healthcare cost would be nice as well.

 @liamdoesthingsAmerican Solidarity from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

No, replace it with a decentralized federal system mixed with private companies.

 @9C78WL7from Virgin Islands  answered…2yrs2Y

I support patient protection and also affordable care should be disbanded and the health care should be free

 @9BC6VGHAmerican Solidarity from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

 @99GV2JL from Oklahoma  answered…2yrs2Y

 @98DXP72American Solidarity from Nebraska  answered…3yrs3Y

No, legislation should remove and trivialize insurance in the context of healthcare.

 @97X5KHMAmerican Solidarity from Maryland  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TRGZ7JAmerican Solidarity from Kentucky  answered…4yrs4Y

 @68QRLZTAmerican Solidarity from Louisiana  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, I believe it is a good start, but I would like to work towards establishing a healthcare system similar to Germany's healthcare system

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...