Euthanasia, the practice of ending a life prematurely in order to end pain and suffering, is currently considered a criminal offense.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Zipcode:
@9W33NL4Peace and Freedom12mos12MO
Diese Frage ist zu schwer zu beantworten. Man muss von Situation zu Situation unterscheiden und abwägen.
Yes if they are consenting adults they should be able to do as they please it’s their life
yes, only if there's no chance of surviving their illness and someone examins them to show they fully understand the choice
@9BTRFFXWomen’s Equality2yrs2Y
This doesn't really affect me.
@97QNLCKWomen’s Equality3yrs3Y
NO. no side of suicide should be worth it. its better they get help with treatment then die, even if the treatment kills them.
They must have two verifications that they are terminally ill. What people do with their body as long as they are in their right mind is their business
What are they gonna do arrest them? No they can't CUZ THEY ARE DEAD.
@8XGPSQWWomen’s Equality4yrs4Y
I’m mixed… I feel as though the terminally ill patient have some time to live, before they succumb to the illness.
Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness and after a psychological examination has been done to show that they fully understand the choice.
Yes, but only if they truly have no body left that cares for them.
Yes but only if there is no chance they can recover and after they have a psychological examination that shows that they fully understand the choice they are taking.
@8NLPYRKWomen’s Equality5yrs5Y
No, it is against the bible to suicided
Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness and Yes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice
Depends on a person to person
@8K5T2RSWomen’s Equality5yrs5Y
Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness and they have had a psychological examination to show they fully understand the choice
@8G89BYTWomen’s Equality5yrs5Y
Yes but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness and after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice. Nobody should have to suffer.
@8CXGJHGWomen’s Equality5yrs5Y
It should depend on the illness and what the family wants to do.
@9CBHZQPWomen’s Equality2yrs2Y
It depends on the patient. If someone is suffering that much, they have the right to do that, we can't intervene. Yes it may mean loosing a loved one, but...
@99NBDC7Women’s Equality3yrs3Y
Depends on the situation of the patient, how ill they are, and their age.
@8SW8GN7Women’s Equality4yrs4Y
yes, but it must have the consent of the patient before implementation.
@8F6NP7YWomen’s Equality5yrs5Y
Yes, but only if the patient agrees and is in immense pain/has absolutely no chance of surviving.
With follow up from the person assisting. If a person wants to end their life then have at it. But the person assisting could feel regret and fall deep into depression, or end up realizing that they're a killer.
Yes, at least it will give the terminally ill patients control of something about their illness. We shouldn't make them suffer through prolong pain if they don't want to.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
