Try the political quiz
+

10 Replies

 @BCWX8D2  from California  commented…2 days2D

Expansion of the Katy Freeway in Houston, Texas is one of many examples of the induced demand that adding more lanes to a freeway would cause. Solutions should be found in better guided traffic and reducing wait time at stoplights, especially during rush hours.

 @BCX6NNM from Texas  disagreed…2 days2D

The reason why we see so much congestion and traffic on our roads is because there is almost no other options to take, and the choices we do have are extremely limited and disconnected from destination to destination. If we build more highways we will waste funds that we could have used to build our public infrastructure and repeat this cycle of insanity. There is also proof that people don't even want to drive around 36% of drivers see it a repetitive chore. I'm absolutely certain if we gave them the option they will use busses trains and other methods of public transportation and this will create a massive hole in our congestion problem.

 @BCX86HC from California  disagreed…2 days2D

A strong counterargument is that the premise—“we must expand highways to match growing driving demand”—treats traffic as a fixed problem, when in reality highway expansion often creates the very demand it is meant to solve.

 @BCX9GTC from South Carolina  disagreed…2 days2D

expanding highways has only rediritcted people from other forms of transportation back onto highways, expanding highways expands the number of people who use it leading to the same amount of congestion

 @BCXGTYR from Wisconsin  disagreed…2 days2D

Expanding highways does not significantly reduce traffic congestion, bolstering public transport would. It would mean 30 people in one vehicle versus 30 cars on the road. It would also provide transport for people with lower income.

 @BCXHK4F from California  disagreed…2 days2D

When will the expansion end? The population will continue to increase for more years to come why not fund more public transportation and bullet trains.

 @BCXL77Zfrom Maine  disagreed…1 day1D

Public Transportation is Cheaper in the long run and will draw the people away from individual traffic. This way the highway system won't have to be expanded,and Travel will be made more available for a majority.

 @BCXLJQPDemocrat from Arizona  disagreed…1 day1D

Public transportation expansion would lead to less people driving meaning less traffic AND no need for the large highways.

 @BCXML9G from California  disagreed…1 day1D

creating more efficient lines and areas of public transportation will entice people to take public transportation, resulting in less congestions on freeways and prime time traffic.

 @BCY39H5 from New Hampshire  disagreed…18hrs18H

We have many highways in the U.S, creating more would invade local wildlife spaces, create more construction, and cause more cars to produce harmful gases. If we focused more on public transportation, less people would have to pay gas and gas emissions would decrease.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity3 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias97%Active inPartyRepublicanLocationUnknown