We protect life at conception for other species, why not our own?
Here are the top political news stories for today.
@BB94BPP3mos3MO
Life does not begin at conception. Even the bible says it begins at first breath, which is farther in the pregnancy. Abortions should be allowed until the 3rd trimester, when the child is almost fully developed.
@BBB5N9D 3mos3MO
You are factually incorrect the bible does not say that anywhere in fact it says
Jeremiah 1:5 ESV /
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”
Psalm 127:3 ESV /
Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward.
@BB7D6LJ4mos4MO
While birds lay eggs and carry with their own lives later on, humans do not for we are more complex creatures. As such showing in evolution due to human newborn babies being entirely dependent on it's mother or guardian for survival since our brains have developed to grow larger than any other mammalian that said newborn can't lift it's own head. No other animal exceeds such dependence, and even if they did temporarily, it wouldn't be life long. Animals at most have to care for their young for merely months to sometimes a couple years. Humans do not have such a luxury, as… Read more
@BB7SKTR3mos3MO
@BB7L7753mos3MO
@BB7Z98K3mos3MO
@BB7VRXKRepublican3mos3MO
As a Christian man, I agree with this statement. But it can also be argued without the Bible as a foundation. A fertilized egg in 9 months will be a fully formed human being. It's hard to determine outside conception when an egg becomes human because the potential of the fetus being a fully formed human remains the same. Once an egg is fertilzed it has the full potential of becoming a living being. Science is not on the side of Pro-Choice. Choosing to kill your child is brought on by societal pressures and, for the most part, your own free will. I think we should have better options and… Read more
@BB7MK3T3mos3MO
@BB832TQ3mos3MO
@BB7TKV63mos3MO
@BB7JYXN3mos3MO
@BB96M7Q3mos3MO
@BB8QT4NRepublican3mos3MO
@BB83ZQV 3mos3MO
Because unlike endangered birds humans have a stable population. To build off the example of endangered birds then why not take in account for intrusive species. We kill off animals because of their over population so why don't we kill off humans? Because it's due to over population of one species that can throw off the ecosystem, which humans have done by causing climate change. So to think of it in environmental views, by allowing choice between conception, humans are lowering the chance for more downsides that are caused by the human race.
@BB7TVBL3mos3MO
@BB7SRP53mos3MO
@BB7SMF73mos3MO
@BB7S4HH3mos3MO
No one saying have an abortion when there’s a heartbeat and full term. While scientifically an embryo in its early stages is a developing group of cell. There should be limitations of when and how long someone can have an abortion til, but there should be no ban. Some women can die of pregnancies if the baby happens to die in the belly and a women’s life shouldn’t be at risk if there are options.
@BB7Q6DY 3mos3MO
@BB7P7273mos3MO
A core pro-choice argument is that while a fetus may have moral value, no person should be legally required to use their body to sustain another life against their will. Pregnancy involves significant physical, medical, and emotional demands, and in most areas of law, people cannot be forced to donate organs, blood, or bodily resources—even to save someone else. In a diverse society where people hold different beliefs about when life begins, the decision to continue a pregnancy should remain with the individual who is directly affected, rather than being mandated by the government.
@BB7NN7TWomen’s Equality3mos3MO
@BB7M54R3mos3MO
It's the mothers choice. If she can't financially help raise a child it isn't fair to the child or the mother. In other cases the pregnancy may be fatal for the mother and she could possibly die from it. Some may argue that the mother made her choices now she has to live with the consequences what about cases of rape or incest? That should be taken into account. It's a heavy weight upon the mother and it should be her choice not anyone else's.
@BB7LZSFWomen’s Equality3mos3MO
@BB7L3LR3mos3MO
At conception, the so-called "life" is only a bunch of cells; it is not truly living until a heart is beating. Besides, these birds are endangered, most likely because of us, and humans, on the other hand, are overpopulating the Earth. Sometimes it is far more important to protect what we have already ruined instead of protecting ourselves. At the very least, it is also the decision of a mother.
The fetus does not have a heartbeat nor a brain and never took a breath therefore the fetus is not alive. We choose to protect the other species as well it should be a choice not banned. If someone is raped they deserve the choice to get rid of it and if someone is too young and have the fetus will kill them they should get rid of it.
@BB7KY5Z3mos3MO
@BB7KXJ4Peace and Freedom3mos3MO
Because getting pregnant can be an accident and not everyone wants kids its scary, and dangerous,and a big responsibility. I would rather a baby not be born then to be born and have an awful life because its parents never wanted it. If someone wants to have a child they can if they don't then you can't force them that's not right.
@BB7K9GP3mos3MO
@BB7JT8G3mos3MO
I agree, but it is important for women to have a CHOICE on what to do with their own bodies. The way they get pregnant could also vary. They might've gotten pregnant by being raped, which is a reason to abort the baby. Children, ages as young as 9, could get pregnant by being raped. Why should they be forced to keep the baby when they are babies themselves?
@BB7H2ZH 4mos4MO
Most animals that lay eggs or conceive children have a choice in this matter, but some humans get raped or forced to conceive a child they're not ready for. It's not your body, so it's not your choice. Unless it directly affects your life, keep your hands off of women's bodies and what they decide to do to them.
@BB7D6ZYWorking Family4mos4MO
@BB7CQRD4mos4MO
We should not prioritize a life of an unborn baby simply because we do for other animals. We protect baby bird eggs to help their struggling population. Humanity is not a struggling population. We should be focusing on the lives we already have instead of wasting efforts for a fetus that cannot process any type of thought yet
A simple counterargument is that being biologically alive is not the same as being a legal person with rights. Many things in the body are alive, but they are not treated as independent individuals. The real debate is about when personhood begins, and people have different beliefs about that.
The comparison to bird eggs is also different because those laws are meant to protect animal species, not to require one person to use their own body to support another. Pregnancy involves a person’s body, health, and consent, which makes it a unique situation that wildlife laws don’t address.
@BB7C3HJ4mos4MO
@BB7PV4T3mos3MO
@BB7KFCF3mos3MO
The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.