Do you support the use of nuclear energy?
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
@B6XSKF94wks4W
Yes there needs to be a national push for more nuclear energy as it is not only clean but produces more energy compared to other varients of clean energy like wind and solar using a much smaller area.
@B6XR42K4wks4W
Although it may be clean unless it’s completely managed by the perfect robotics or beings always has a chance thus we should invest in more methods that if mismanaged wont cause extensive damages to surroundings and the planet.
@B6XT89R4wks4W
yes but only if it is nationalized we cannot allow the private sector to manage it in case of failure
@B6X24DC4wks4W
I do agree with this. Nuclear has little to no waste, and since it is sort of dangerous, we regulate it and store it well. Additionally, they run for longer with less maintenance or material than coal or gas fire plants.
@B6XZ5JL4wks4W
Nuclear energy is cleaner in the long run and gives significantly more coverage for a smaller investment overall.
@B6Y34C54wks4W
I agree with the author of this comment, Nuclear energy produces a very little amount of emissions. It doesn''t pollute the environment, and it produces a massive amount of energy. It would help keep up with the energy needs of the United States.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.