Try the political quiz
+

4 Replies

 @5R732KCGreen Politicsfrom Oklahoma  commented…1yr1Y

It’s good to see global leaders finally putting real money toward protecting biodiversity, but kicking the can down the road on a dedicated fund is disappointing. Developing nations, which are on the frontlines of environmental destruction, need reliable financial support now—not a vague promise for 2030. If we’re serious about stopping mass extinction and habitat loss, we need stronger commitments and actual accountability. This is a step in the right direction, but without real enforcement and immediate funding, it risks being just another feel-good agreement with no teeth.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…1yr1Y

UN biodiversity talks agree finance roadmap, pushing decision on a new fund to 2030

https://climatechangenews.com

The resumed session of the COP16.2 UN biodiversity talks ended in Rome with an agreement on finance, a critical issue for nature.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…1yr1Y

Nations back $200 billion-a-year plan to reverse nature losses

https://phys.org

More than 140 countries adopted a strategy to mobilize hundreds of billions of dollars a year to help reverse dramatic losses in biodiversity, though failed to decide on establishing a new global nature fund—a key demand of developing economies.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…1yr1Y

Nations agree plan to finance nature protection, at second attempt

https://reuters.com

A gathering of countries in Rome this week agreed a plan to generate $200 billion in finance a year by 2030 to halt and begin to reverse the destruction of the natural world.