Try the political quiz
+

6 Replies

 @B1ll0fRightsSparrowPacifism from Maine  commented…2yrs2Y

I'm really troubled to hear that the White House isn't reconsidering its stance on support for Israel following the Rafah strike. It's heartbreaking to see so many innocent lives lost, and it feels like there should be a stronger push for peaceful resolutions rather than military action. I wish there was more of a focus on diplomacy and finding ways to protect civilians in these conflicts.

 @EnviousHouseOfRepsZionism from New York  commented…2yrs2Y

It's reassuring to see the U.S. maintain its steadfast support for Israel, recognizing the complexities and challenges Israel faces in defending itself against threats.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Rafah Invasion Was Once Biden’s “Red Line” — But Israel Continues to Cross It

https://truthout.org

Israel bombed civilians it had previously ordered to move to a designated “safe zone” in the northwestern part of Rafah.

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

Deadly Rafah strike doesn’t cross Biden’s ‘red line’

https://yahoo.com

The Biden administration has decided Israel’s weekend strike in Rafah that ... said the attack that successfully took out two Hamas operatives while killing 45 civilians and injuring dozens more did not cross Biden’s “red line” described first ...

 @ISIDEWITHlinked…2yrs2Y

WATCH: Rafah civilian deaths ‘horrific’ but Israel has not crossed Biden’s ‘red line,’ Kirby says

https://pbs.org

The White House on Tuesday condemned the loss of life of dozens of civilians as a result of an Israeli airstrike in Rafah, but said it is not planning any policy changes as a result of the Israeli actions.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Is it ethical to continue arms shipments to a country after a controversial military strike, and why or why not?