Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Rent Control

5.2k Replies

 @9R4BLBCLibertarian from California  answered…2yrs2Y

There should be an executive order that controls rent for a limited period of time to help reduce inflation

 @88P6BZ6Constitution  from California  answered…2mos2MO

I think there should be something akin to rent control but I don't trust the government. I am problably closer to wanting to see some form of incentivization as opposed to coercion.

 @aminus57Republican  from Hawaii  answered…5mos5MO

NO... The government should not implement rent control. Price caps violate cause and effect by discouraging construction and maintenance, shrinking supply, degrading quality, and worsening shortages over time. Justice and stewardship are better served by expanding housing supply and competition, not suppressing prices in ways that ultimately harm renters, especially the most vulnerable.

 @9XPJLMGLibertarian  from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

no, but he government can provide affordable housing. That also creates more jobs and gives back to the communities

 @9XGC9T5Libertarian from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Only in some Markets, where the cost of living has gotten out of control. And the need to reduce monopolies/ownership groups from using software or coercing with other Commercial owners to influence the highs & lows of rents.

 @9XB34XHLibertarian from Idaho  answered…2yrs2Y

It depends on how low they make it because the land lords make a large portion of their money off of it and couldn't survive without it, but on that same note, it shouldn't be outrageously high cost rent.

 @9X7FGV2Libertarian  from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes and no. I think they need to regulate and remove large corporations and their subsidiaries from being involved in residential ownership, sales and more and regulate those specific organizations and any related, owned or funded businesses.

 @9WTB689Libertarian from South Dakota  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should slow down private equity businesses from purchasing single family homes to rent for profit.

 @9WCCRFPTaxpayers from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

To a certain extent, people need places to live, and these renters do need to have their own income to pay for their investment and to live.

 @9W47SDMConstitution from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

If they do it needs to be a percentage of revenue not a set number so that land lords don’t set it at the highest limit

 @9VV9WGDLibertarian from Connecticut  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should implement a system where the higher the income for the person, the higher the rent.

 @9VPVMSBConstitution from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

Only up to a certain point...the landlord should not be able to charge double the price of their mortgage. In case the property is paid off, no more than 20% over the normal mortgage with surrounding homes

 @9VNS7SQLibertarian from Maryland  answered…2yrs2Y

More attention should be paid to the affordable housing situation than just the rent amounts. Landlords should be held more accountable for the quality of the housing that they provide regardless of the rent.

 @9VJYFTHLibertarian from Kentucky  answered…2yrs2Y

Increase taxes for any land beyond the first, and tie all taxes to the land itself rather than what's built on it de-incentivizing hoarding of property

 @9V727WBLibertarian from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

To a point, the government should prevent landlords from price-gouging practices or increasing rents of an extensive amount without cause, such as an increase in property taxes, utilities, and price of ownership caused by inflation

 @9TQGPCVLibertarian from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, instead they should focus on having a balanced budget so that the economy could become healthy and stable so therefore rent prices are not high

 @9THKFNRConstitution from Ohio  answered…2yrs2Y

Only to Big business buying and then hiking up rent but people should be able to own how many houses they want.

 @9TH37TDConstitution from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should stay out of commerce and private business altogether and let the free market perform

 @9TDG24BLibertarian from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

I think that there should be laws so the landlords can't overprice buildings and I think they shouldn't be able to do unreasonable rent increases they know people in their building cant afford.

 @9T9GM9SLibertarian from Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

I think if a landlord is allowed to keep raising rent then the place should be in impeccable condition. They should have everything they need and when 1 tenant moves out and a new one moves in, everything should be renovated not just cleaned. New carpet, new paint, new appliances as long as they aren't super old and still work, new locks, air conditioning etc...

 @9SZDQYDConstitution from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

Market forces should drive costs. The government will take away supply. However the gov has to protect from monopolies

 @9SVX4CXLibertarian from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

Rent is so high because mortgages are! It can’t be one way across the board. People won’t want to invest if they can’t even get their mortgage covered by rent?

 @9SGC58PLibertarian from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but other measures should be put in place to prevent the mass buy ups of single family homes by large corporations.

 @9S7P3V4Libertarian from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and there should be stricter mandated regulations for maintaining the properties, to prevent housing quality issues.

 @9S29FLVLibertarian from Kentucky  answered…2yrs2Y

It just depends, its more of how the economy is doing, although there should be something so its not too expensive.

 @9RW4W8JLibertarian from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Absolutely. The ongoing problem we have when we finally get the minimum wage raised by a couple dollars is that the cost of living immediately increases by a higher margin than said increase and that calculates to actually making less despite the numeric increase in income. If we cap the cost of limit we will combat the necessity to constantly need to raise minimum wage.

 @9RQ8YZNLibertarian from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

Should increase taxes on owners of multiple dwelling units to discourage renters and encourage buying.

 @9RP7RLRLibertarian from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only in cases where large corporations that own large amounts of real estate in an area can control the prices (ie Blackrock)

 @9RNV8TVLibertarian from Tennessee  answered…2yrs2Y

Less inflation = lower rent costs. The government shouldn't have to have a say in what a landlord does. If it's easy to simply live as an American (groceries, gas, etc.) then rent price will decrease too. Any landlord charging too much will be forced to bring rent price down.

 @9RMQKGRLibertarian from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but government should regulate the purchase of multiple homes for the purpose of renting unless they build or rennovate

 @9RLGG2GLibertarian from Iowa  answered…2yrs2Y

Renting as part of a business should be outlawed, but private individuals should be able to rent out individual properties without such regulations

 @maadiman1170Libertarian from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No - the free and voluntary exchange of goods and services between consenting parties is a cornerstone of freedom & liberty, and thus should not be meddled with by any government.

 @9RJB5TDLibertarian from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, and the government should not allow large corporations to purchase single family homes. There should be a required listing period for a home to be on the market before a non-individual can make bids on single family homes.

 @9RHV28HLibertarian from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but landlords should not have the freedom to charge rent that is higher than the property is worth staying at.

 @9RDYNXTLibertarian from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

The landlords underlying mortgages should also not be able to be raised beyond a certain threshold. it is not entirely up to the landlord what they charge for rent. nb

 @9R7ZVMMLibertarian from California  answered…2yrs2Y

If the property taxes lower for landlords. I do believe there should be a limit to how much should be charged based off the taxes

 @7XFQBH7Libertarian  from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but it would be better if we implemented a land value tax instead to deincentivize mass scale ownership of rental properties.

 @9R643V5Constitution from Mississippi  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should limit the amount of increases to be consistent with inflation. They are here to protect t the citizens not controle free enterprise!

 @9R4XJGTReform from Oklahoma  answered…2yrs2Y

If you live in an apartment complex the landlord can only charge for the space you live in, and the monthly rent charge is deductible depending on any issues that are not fixed by the month of reporting.

 @9KZ4VDRConstitution  from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on the circumstances. Government should intervein and bring back affordable housing. Housing prices are outrageous.

 @9QST293Libertarian from Missouri  answered…2yrs2Y

I lean towards no, but rent increases should still be responsible and reasonable for the renter. Maybe limit by percentage annually.

 @87RZLZKLibertarian  from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, in that the rate of increase can only match inflation. Long term renters (especially elderly) should not be penalized because market value went up.

 @9Q7P9GWLibertarian from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only for profit above a certain amount, or based on square footage so can't charge over a certain range for the square footage depending on average income of the area.

 @9MNSQ55Constitution from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9YH9CK2Constitutionfrom Maine  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government needs to stop usurping power and authority where it is not constitutionally given to them. It is up to the state.

 @9Y6ZL4ZConstitution from Oklahoma  answered…2yrs2Y

No, government should not regulate rent, and landlords should not be able to raise rent without due process

 @9SNM37VReform from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but your rent shouldn't be raised during the rental agreement, but between negotiations can take place

 @9S9DSWCLibertarian from Colorado  answered…2yrs2Y

I think there should be a national average rent per square foot and living conditions. That way landlords can still charge as much as they see fit and its up to the renter to agree to the price or not

 @9S49DV5Libertarian from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, also corporations or the government should not be able to buy places to rent to the public. They buy up houses then jack up the prices on people

 @9RSX5N3Constitution  from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should not be able to decide what private business owners and the like charge for their services

 @9RRSNJYLibertarian from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

The majority of the high rent houses are owned by blackrock, not standalone landlords. Large corporations should not be allowed to own more than 10 family homes.

 @9RD6BXZLibertarian from Tennessee  answered…2yrs2Y

We already have public housing and housing based on income The government has no business regulating private owners of their rental property

 @9RCC5XJLibertarian from Ohio  answered…2yrs2Y

The price of rent should be applicable to the median income of the area, without losing our free market

 @CurvyletterConstitution answered…2yrs2Y

No, as policies promoting increased housing supply and targeted subsidies offer more sustainable solutions to housing affordability

 @9PS6FTPLibertarian from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, because it will lower the housing market inflation by forcing every rental property to not ingest too much profit.

 @9N9BZRSLibertarian  from West Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

No. Price fixing any product or service only leads to artificial scarcity and disincentivizes private industry from investing in a real solution.

 @9N8JYJVLibertarian  from Kentucky  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but this is a state / local issue, not Federal.

Congress *could* pass a law implementing a Federal property tax on banks and corporations that own residential rental properties in states beyond the one they're incorporated in, for every dollar they charge above a certain amount.

 @9MS62CQLibertarian from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

I don't think it's necessary. The system will eventually self correct unfortunately a lot of people will be hurt before then. When the money stops coming in or more eviction cases tie up court time, rent will stabilize.

 @9MM6FRHConstitution from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

Pricing should depend on the quality of the housing, where an initial appraisal would be carried out.

 @9Q353SXLibertarian from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

While I am largely anti-regulation, I do believe that landlords shouldn’t be allowed to charge ridiculous amounts.

 @9NS8J5GLibertarian from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

No. The market should decide. The government should only be policing collusion and other obviously discriminatory practices.

 @9NPDDHYLibertarian from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

Not necessarily a law would be required, but incentivizing growth in the state or city to have affordable apartments and not allowing companies to purchase all houses and making them for rent.

 @9NG4JK3Libertarian from Nevada  answered…2yrs2Y

Can only at max double the actual bills for the consumer so if the actual bills with taxes are $750 p/mo for 1700 sqft then the rent can only be $1500 after taxes as the absolute max.

 @9QSLMG3Libertarian from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should enact legislation that prohibits billion dollar corporations from buying single family homes.

 @9NYVMPQLibertarian from Vermont  answered…2yrs2Y

No, low income housing should reflect a profit motive and the government should have a permanent cap on real estate taxes.

 @9RPDSTGLibertarian from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

No

Rent control would disincentivise building more housing.

Doing this would be treating the symptoms, not the disease. The disease is insufficient housing, the symptoms are skyrocketing housing costs.

Rent control would just lock in good prices for the few who are lucky enough to get housing. We need to upzone and deregulate housing construction to address the disease.

 @9XZNLH7Constitution from Utah  answered…2yrs2Y

I think that landlords should be able to charge as much as they want for rent but there should be restrictions on if landlords can increase rent spontaneously.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...