Try the political quiz
+

13 Replies

 @RatifiedLlamaLibertarian from Colorado  commented…2yrs2Y

He has many choices.

Had Iran attacked first, a response would be necessary. Iran didn't attack first.

As it stands, Iran has sent its message not to attack its consulates, Israel has no major damage, mark it as a draw and move on.

We dont want to fund his war.

 @NobleR3volutionRepublican from Wisconsin  disagreed…2yrs2Y

It wasn’t a consulate and Iran certainly did attack first. Hamas is a well known Iranian proxy. October 7th happened with their support.

Just as Hezbollah is a directly funded Iranian proxy. They’ve bombed enough northern Israel to displace 60,000 Israelis.

That’s why Iranian generals were in Syria. That’s why Israel targeted them.

 @BrightLibertyForward from Texas  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Iran has been attacking Israel via proxies for the past 6 months. Israel IN RESPONSE killed the general in charge of activating these proxies. The general was hiding specifically because he received intel that Israel is looking to eliminate him for killing Jews.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Is there ever a situation where not responding to an attack could be seen as a stronger stance than retaliation?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Considering the potential for a retaliatory action to lead to war, would you support or oppose your country's decision to respond militarily to an attack?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

How would you feel if your government decided to retalitate against another country's aggressive actions, knowing it might escalate into a wider conflict?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

Do you believe in responding to violence with violence, or is there room for diplomacy even after a serious attack?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2yrs2Y

If your country was attacked similarly to Israel, do you think retaliation is the only response, or are there other ways to handle such conflicts?

 @9LKG7HY from Texas  commented…2yrs2Y

Israel has contributed to this escalating crisis, both through its oppression and displacement of Palestinians over generations as well as through provocation of Iran on embassy grounds. Israel has had choices for many years, but they continue to make choices that contribute to instability. The U.S. should not support their escalation and work with partner governments like Jordan to bring the temperature of the region down. If Israel persists, we should stop all military support and only intervene in humanitarian aid capacity.

 @ZealfulBicameralDemocrat from Connecticut  commented…2yrs2Y

Very correct! An attempt to destroy another country should not go unanswered. Lloyd Austin needs to know that by the same analogy it is necessary to respond to the terrorist regime of the Kremlin until it is completely destroyed. Otherwise they will destroy civilization!

 @SadFrogPeace and Freedom from Utah  commented…2yrs2Y

They absolutely have a choice. They started this exchange and they do not get the final move

 @VengefulSuperPACGreen from New York  commented…2yrs2Y

 @C4pitalistTurtleUnity from Massachusetts  commented…2yrs2Y

Is the U.S. gonna have to shell another billion to defend Israel again while Israel spends 1/10th of that? Did Austin remind Gallant that Israel started this with the embassy attack and wanted to instigate a conflict that draws America into the equation?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...