The War Zone was first to break the news that the Navy had frantically worked to certify its Super Hornets and Growlers to carry AIM-9X Sidewinder short-range air-to-air missiles on their outer under-wing stations.
Navy Rear Admiral Stephen Tedford, head of Naval Air Systems Command's (NAVAIR) Program Executive Office for Unmanned Aviation and Strike Weapons, or PEO (U&W), had announced the initiative at the Navy League's annual Sea Air Space conference earlier this week. You can read more about all of this in our initial reporting here.
For the Super Hornets, this is in addition to the AIM-9Xs commonly carried on their wingtip rails. For the Growler, the AIM-9X is entirely new, at least for the U.S. Navy (the Australians have this capability already), and will augment the pair of AIM-120 AMRAAMs the type commonly carries on its intake stores stations. The Growler's AN/ALQ-218(V)2 electronic warfare suite relies on pods mounted on the jet's wingtip stations, so Sidewinders have never called those locations home.
The ability of both the Growler and Super Hornet to rapidly respond to pop-up threats heading toward commercial shipping or allied warships is critical. Navy tactical jets have shot down numerous malicious drones in recent months, with the first known 'kill' occurring in late December. Since then, numerous drones have been downed by fighters, and kill markings are popping up on the noses of various jets in IKE's air wing.
If anything else, this rapidly deployed upgrade is a good practice run for quickly delivering critical capabilities and enhancements to suit a hot conflict area. During a major fight in the Pacific, these types of quick-reaction programs would likely be prevalent and ongoing.
In this case, the fact that Australia's Growlers had this capability already certainly offered a head start, but making this happen so quickly is still impressive.
At its core, this proves that the U.S. military can move fast when it really has to, at least in some ways.
.Here are the top political news stories for today.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
How do you feel about using advanced technology for military purposes, especially when it involves engaging unmanned drones?
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ElandRickVeteran2yrs2Y
Firing $400,000 missiles to take down $2,000 drones. What alternative is there, it might well be asked.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.