Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s running mate has been a harsh critic of in vitro fertilization, while funding alternative research on extending women’s reproductive years.
Nicole Shanahan has for years denounced IVF — calling it “one of the biggest lies that’s being told about women’s health today.”
At the same time, she has also been a vocal proponent of and financial backer for unconventional research into the possibility of helping women having children into their 50s and exploring no-cost interventions to help women conceive, such as exposure to sunlight.
“I’m not sure that there has been a really thorough mitochondrial respiration study on the effects of two hours of morning sunlight on reproductive health.
I would love to fund something like that,” Shanahan said to a 2023 panel with the National Academy of Medicine, a group to which she had previously donated $100 million.The statement was met with chuckles, “Yeah, let’s do it,” she added. “I just have an intuition that could be interesting and maybe work.”
As a candidate, her criticisms of IVF have taken on heightened importance following an Alabama Supreme Court’s ruling that embryos are children, which briefly forced clinics in the states to pause operations. Republicans and Democrats — including both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump — rushed to defend the procedure, which is broadly popular.
The 38-year-old’s opposition to IVF and skepticism of the fertility industry makes her an outlier in the presidential field — though she has not called for banning the procedure.
Kennedy has not weighed in on IVF access, and has made conflicting comments about abortion access.
At the Iowa State Fair, Kennedy, 70, said he supported a ban on abortion after 15 or 21 weeks of pregnancy, but then his campaign said he misunderstood the question and does not support such a ban.
.Here are the top political news stories for today.
@Activi5tLukeNo Labels2yrs2Y
You are being disingenuous.
Finding ways to protect & promote fertility so IVF is not necessary is the goal.
IVF is incredibly costly, invasive & often unsuccessful.
It is a tortuous journey for most women. We should be researching ways to protect & promote fertility.
As a warrior mama who conceived through IVF, I can tell you it is an arduous journey that is like mortgaging a house.
Interestingly, aspirin increases live birth rates and isn’t or wasn’t back then part of the IVF protocols. Why? Because it is dirt cheap & available OTC.
Melatonin, a potent free radical scavenger which improves follicle/egg quality is often missing from IVF protocols. Why? Because Big Pharma can’t charge thousands of dollars for it.
Our health system has been hijacked by Big Pharma & wanna be mamas pay the price. Literally.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
How do you reconcile the personal desire for biological children with ethical concerns that may arise from procedures like IVF?
@9L72NW22yrs2Y
@SeagullClaireDemocrat2yrs2Y
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.