Try the political quiz

72 Replies

 @9FQG9QV from Iowa disagreed…6mos6MO

There's no such thing as "undeniable evidence," there is always a possibility of something being proved wrong. Forensics is never 100% and witnesses can always lie or misinterpret things. Also what can be considered as a "horrific crime" is completely subjective and can lead to people constantly fluctuating the standards for what qualifies as "Death Penalty Worthy."

 @9HQXZQL from Connecticut agreed…3mos3MO

If someone kills 20 people, the easiest and arguably best thing to do would be to kill them. If a developing child with a severe mental disorder and a poor living condition killed 2 people, fixing their problems should be a higher concern than what their punishment should be.

 @9GS33SQ from Utah disagreed…5mos5MO

No one deserves to die. If we kill people what is the difference between killers and the government.

 @9G74FX9 from New York disagreed…6mos6MO

People who commit unspeakable crimes have no right to live. Tax payers money should ntk go to feeding and sheltering a criminal

 @9FQ26VW from Tennessee disagreed…6mos6MO

No one has the authority to say whether someone should be allowed to live or die, except for medical circumstances where death is preferential to severe pain or lack of recovery.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...