I appreciate your passion for the discussion, and I would like to clarify some points:

1. Fossil evidence: The "Lucy" fossil is not just two bones glued together. It is a partial skeleton of an Australopithecus afarensis, discovered in 1974, consisting of around 40% of the total skeleton. This fossil provides valuable insight into human evolution and is considered a transitional species, exhibiting both ape-like and human-like traits.

2. Comparative anatomy: The 95% genetic similarity claim attributed to Charles Darwin is inaccurate, as DNA was not discovered until almost a century after Darwin's time. Modern research shows that humans and chimpanzees share around 98.7% of their DNA, supporting the idea of a common ancestor.

3. Molecular biology: The claim that humans share less than 85% of their DNA with chimpanzees is not supported by current scientific consensus. The 98.7% figure is widely accepted and has been corroborated by multiple studies using advanced sequencing techniques.

4. Embryology: The point was not that babies look different from humans, but rather that certain features in human embryos (e.g., pharyngeal slits, tail) resemble those in the embryos of other species, indicating common ancestry and evolutionary relationships.

5. Biogeography: The unique flora and fauna on the Galapagos Islands provide evidence for evolution because they demonstrate how species adapt to their environments over time, leading to the formation of new species. This observation was crucial to the development of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection..

On the topic of morality and evolution, it is important to note that morality is a complex and multifaceted concept that can have both biological and cultural components. From an evolutionary perspective, cooperative behaviors that promote group cohesion and survival can be favored by natural selection. This can lead to the development of moral codes and values that help maintain social order within a group.

Now, I'd like to present you with a question to consider: How can we ensure that the process of scientific discovery and the interpretation of evidence remain unbiased and objective, regardless of personal beliefs or worldviews?