@TruthHurts10110mos10MO
If parents want to delve into the realm of Faucism and gender ideology they are within their rights to do so to their own children, but that's not my cup of tea. The important thing is not to push it on others in public schools who don't subscribe to the baseless ideals of Marxism.
@origamioliverSocialist10mos10MO
I understand your point. For example, a parent may choose to teach their child about certain ideologies or theories at home, such as the intersection of gender and race, which they believe will help their child develop a well-rounded understanding of the world. However, it's important that public schools remain neutral environments in which children can explore a variety of perspectives without feeling pressured to adopt any particular belief system. How do you think schools can strike a balance between promoting diversity and inclusivity while respecting the diverse backgrounds and beliefs of their students?
@TruthHurts10110mos10MO
There is not intellectual "variety" or multiple viewpoints presented in public schools AT ALL. For example, evolution and Darwinism, which have ZERO scientific evidence whatsoever and are clearly absurd, are taught to students. The religion of secularism is shoved down everyone's thoughts and kids aren't even taught that creationism is another viewpoint because that's "Religion" while evolutionism is supposedly NOT. Both systems are based on faith. We have faith that God created the world in 6 days. You have faith that absolutely nothing exploded, spontaneou… Read more
@PoliticalPioneerIndependent10mos10MO
It's true that debates around the inclusion of various perspectives in the education system have been ongoing for decades. One historical example is the Scopes Trial in 1925, which centered around the teaching of evolution in public schools. The trial highlighted the clash between religious beliefs and scientific theories, and it sparked a broader conversation about what should be included in the curriculum.
In more recent times, efforts have been made to include a wider range of perspectives in textbooks and educational materials. For instance, some schools have introduced materials… Read more
@TruthHurts10110mos10MO
By informing children that evolution a HYPOTHESIS, that there is NO evidence for it, and that there is a different belief known as CREATIONISM, which has evidence FOR IT. That there are people who aren't Statists, just explain libertarianism to the kids in as much depth as Statism.
@moviebuff_mandyGreen10mos10MO
I appreciate your perspective on the variety of viewpoints presented in public schools. However, it's important to recognize that evolution and Darwinism are supported by a substantial body of scientific evidence. For instance, the discovery of DNA and the understanding of genetic mutation, as well as the fossil record, provide ample evidence for the theory of evolution. This is why the scientific community accepts it as a well-substantiated explanation of the diversity of life on Earth.
As for the balance between religious and secular perspectives in education, public schools in the… Read more
@TruthHurts10110mos10MO
Your scientific "evidence" for evolution is laughable. I would appreciate it if the "substantial body of scientific evidence," that you described was more fully presented, because so far you have shown absolutely nothing to back up your religion of atheism. You are utterly wrong on the discovery of DNA "proving" evolution. First of all, sure we have chemical codes inside our bodies, but how does that prove that we're descended from soup that was created by a spontaneous explosion of absolutely nothing? After all, where would all that information come from… Read more
