The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a 19-million-acre national wildlife refuge in northern Alaska. The refuge includes a large variety of species of plants and animals, such as polar bears, grizzly bears, black bears, moose, caribou, wolves, eagles, lynx, wolverine, marten, beaver and migratory birds, which rely on the refuge. In August 2020 the Trump administration approved program to auction oil leases that would enable oil companies to drill for oil within the refuge. Environmentalists argue that oil development threatens wildlife and is likely to worsen climate change. Proponents argue that drilling would be limited to the coastal ranges and would make the U.S. more energy independent.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
@9PZ9P5210mos10MO
No, not until we have depleted all other oil reserves and with very strict environmental regulations
@9VW2C8D7mos7MO
No, because wildlife has to have somewhere to go that like humans you come attack our home, we would defend our living at every cost
@9LYY94C1yr1Y
No, instead find a non-populated environment and drill there. As well as increase alternative energy subsidies.
@9FHGG8GIndependent2yrs2Y
Yes, but slowly intergrate into other forms of energy.
@9BL3YWJ2yrs2Y
no we should go for more environmentally friendly solutions and if we run out of oil in our reserves before we can switch to a non fossil fuel solution then yes with very strict regulations
@97TZ2G2Republican2yrs2Y
Yes, but only in a certain section, not a big operation.
@92TH5RT3yrs3Y
no puedo responder esta pregunta no tengo la mayor idea
@92JKX433yrs3Y
I don't really care about it.
@923VRG83yrs3Y
Absolutely not. Animals are losing more of their natural habitat every day. At a refuge animals should be safe and away from dangerous human interaction. I believe that they need to pull out and better protect the animals rather than pushing them out of their homes.
@8WPL93J4yrs4Y
Well, drilling at the refuge would bring noise and pollution to the refuge which most likely isn't good for the refuge.
@8WNNVT84yrs4Y
no GIVE THE DUCKS BACK THERE HOME I SEE U
@8NTFP755yrs5Y
Allow the State of Alaska to decide.
We cannot physically stop someone from drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge. Why make it a opinion of belief when we have no control. It is in your mind, either way if you believe it or not, it will still happen.
@98867P82yrs2Y
No but we should move to alternative energy
@982T4CS2yrs2Y
Yes, but with very strict environmental regulations, but I also think we should be trying to look for alternatives as well.
@8Z7VNS63yrs3Y
We should keep the ones that we have but look for increase alternative energy subsides to eliminated our dependence on fossil fuels .
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.