Try the political quiz

265 Replies

@5V3XVNNDemocratfrom Colorado  answered…3mos

Internet should be a service like water, sewer and electric. Just another utility.

@64MJ5X4Democratfrom New York  answered…3mos

No. The internet should be treated as a utility like it is in other countries. Our access speed is much slower than other countries and it's embarrassing.

@9DXB9DMWomen’s Equality from Missouri answered…3mos

@9R2NKKDVeteran from New Jersey answered…3wks

Internet shouldn’t be taxed and there should be high power internet for everyone at the same price

@9QSWWWCPeace and Freedom from Florida answered…2mos

there should be no private property, and no monetary currency system, this would remove conflict altogether.

@9QJ9S74Democrat from Kansas answered…2mos

@9FTNYM3Green from Missouri answered…3mos

@9FDV39HVeteran from Kentucky answered…3mos

No, they should speed up access to all sites, especially in rural areas with terrible internet for the price of good internet.

@9FC3DNWGreenfrom Maine  answered…3mos

No, and provide high-quallity, free-at-the-point-of-service federally owned broadband.

@9N9VSL7Independent from South Carolina answered…3mos

Not beyond an initial pay-per-quality model. If not to ban pornographic sites, they may be slowed down beyond an initial model to improve other sites. Access to sites that are down should be slowed, until they are back up.

@9MHG2BBLibertarian from Massachusetts answered…3mos

Yes, but the industry should be deregulated to allow more competition.

@Andrew-SkeensLibertarian from Pennsylvania answered…3mos

Yes, private service providers should not be regulated by the government

@9M2Y5QFGreen from Minnesota answered…3mos

Depends on if we’re continuing to promote capitalism. If yes then yes. If no then what are we proposing as a reasonable alternative?

@9LZ4SW5Libertarian from Pennsylvania answered…3mos

Yes, of course a company should be able to offer a product. And another ISP can come along and offer a less restricted product---let the consumer decide.

@natet92Constitution from Michigan answered…3mos

Yes, but this only works if there is not a monopoly on the service.

@9LJL4D7Libertarianfrom Maine  answered…3mos

@9LHR4FPLibertarian from South Carolina answered…3mos

Yes, I disagree, but it is their right to manage their own business.

@9K8MSF5Women’s Equality from North Carolina answered…3mos

@9JTY9GKRepublican from Kansas answered…3mos

Yes, but they should clearly disclose their policy to customers

@9JS28WHSocialist from Massachusetts answered…3mos

No, this is a violation of free speech and should not be permitted for platforms so broad as internet service providers.

@9J8VYW9Democrat from Wisconsin answered…3mos

@9HWCW34Peace and Freedom from Colorado answered…3mos

yes they should speed it up for people that pay more but dont slow the people who pay less.

@9HT8PRSPeace and Freedom from Illinois answered…3mos

No. Because the internet permeates so much of our lives now it is functionally a need and should be considered a public utility.

@9HFKBZXPeace and Freedom from California answered…3mos

@9HDMV6TVeteran from North Carolina answered…3mos

If a website is more visited, the connection should be sped up.

@9H6YBSHPeace and Freedom from California answered…3mos

Yes, but only if they are not receiving any government subsidy... and if they do it should be transparent

@9GXBG5SLibertarian from Georgia answered…3mos

Yes but within reason, there should be minimums in place so everyone can compete.

@9G4NJKBSocialist from New York answered…3mos

No, this would be unconstitutional and add more favor to the wealthiest websites; there's too much of that already.

@9FCQCG6Veteran from North Carolina answered…3mos

No, they should not slow any down, but should be allowed to charge more to boost the speeds. It's frustrating to go to a popular site and have to wait because so much traffic is ahead of you.

@9DLYJ97Socialist from Florida answered…3mos

No, and they should be highly regulated the big telecoms should be broken up and punished for abhorrent treatment of the us customers

@Kyle-CasonRepublican from Massachusetts answered…3mos

Yes, Net neutrality is just another way for the government to regulate the internet

@9RJNB5TPeace and Freedom from Michigan answered…4 days

Websites should have the ability to speed up access, but websites that do not pay should not be penalized.

@9RGWJ6ZLibertarian from Missouri answered…6 days

Search browsers are run by international private companies and should not be subject to much government regulation

@9RCSPC8Democrat from Minnesota answered…2wks

@9RBVZB5Republican from Indiana answered…2wks

Yes, as long as no content is blocked or slowed beyond normal speeds

@9RBHMVYRepublican from Tennessee answered…2wks

This is to similar to direct marketing and I am not in support of direct marketing.

@Darrell-VisinandSocialist from Texas answered…2wks

The internet should not be regulated except to deter violent acts, etc.

@9R7SVTJVeteran from Texas answered…2wks

Businesses should be allowed to choose how and where they make their profit

@9R7QW4ZPeace and Freedom from Colorado answered…2wks

No, net-neutrality keeps the internet open and available for everyone. High speed internet should be considered a utility, just as much as working electricity and running water.

@Grayson-BlountConstitution from Mississippi answered…3wks

I think that they should make it more competitive, the way they should do this is to make web site, that pay more for speed, pay for speed and make it every three months. They should make it based on popularity but subsidize the smaller sites to give them a chance.


The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...