Do you support a universal basic income program?

I support UBI with limitations which require being in the workforce or voulenteer for x amount of time each year.

I believe that this should be given out but under circumstances which makes on eligible so there is no fraud.

Yes, I believe that we should receive an income to cover basic necessities but in cases I do believe if you don't want to work then you don't deserve to have a home because apparently they wanna be a bum and not work.

Yes. However, individuals should have mandatory check ins with designated officials who check if the person is using the income responsibly. Random audits of the funds and credit card statements should be a requirement.

Yes, but in the form of free food, water, housing, and access to internet and electricity, rather than money.

Yes, everyone should receive a universal basic income to Partially cover basic necessities including food and housing!

Yes, but this would mean moving away from minimum wage and replacing welfare. More research needs to be done.

It should provide the bare necessities such as a meal or water, but should not give spending money. This should be obtained through a different source.

Yes, with active employment seeking and/or working at least part-time

I dont even know what that is.

in doing this people may or may not withdraw from the workforce and suddenly harm the way of the economic system, then again it could prove very successful for young adults and highschool graduates in which may be getting into apartments or housing programs.

No, not at this time but possibly sometime in the future.

in the case of people being physically and mentally incapable of working yes

If the people can work, they can, but if they cannot, then the government should be generous enough to help out the people who struggle a little bit.

I approve of believe everyone should have a UBI, if needed, but on the other hand, most americans will get comfortable and not work, and based on that tax would be raised.

IDU this question.

yes but not to much because then people will not want to work or have a drive to be successful in life

Yes, but only if the household is not receiving help from the government.

I think they should be able to submit records that they have a job or working to get one every month in order to keep getting payments.

I feel if that person has a job and not a high in job just any job (excluding disabled) should be eligible for basic income universal.

Yes I agree that people should be able to receive income to cover basic necessities if it is needed in their situations only if they meet some sort of criteria that says they need income to cover basic necessities.

I am sure what this is

Yes, but give fines to those who abuse this program for other things besides necessities.

No, but allow for those less fortunate

I believe that it depends on your finical situation, billionaires do not need money to cover basic housing cost.

I believe that if you have a job and go to work on a day to day basis, you should be apart of the universal income program. If you don't go to work you shouldn't be apart of the program because you could be taking it for granted. The Universal Program should help those who work hard for the help.

Yes, as long as it is not being taken advantage of

They should help the ones that are in need of it in other words below the poverty line of income.

Yes, if they work.

yes but to a certain extent, the government should provide enough to buy food and help with housing but not enough to the point where people don't have to work

people should have help if their job simply doesnt keep up with inflation/the economy but only if they do work

Yes, but people should receive only a minimum to use in important and needed purchases dependent on the situation.

Yes, but with systems implemented to ensure that no one abuses the program

No, but offer lower housing prices for those with low income.

No, dependance on the government would lead to a tyrannical ruling.

I'm kind of 50-50 on this one.

I stand passive on this topic

i agree and disagree. there should be restrictions on this so no one can abuse it

I think for people who struggle to gather money to provide for themselves should receive an income.

continue to see how it works in other countries

yes and no, we dont want people doing less work just because of this income, but yes because it would help with a boost in needs of a household, so maybe only have it for families.

Yes to an extent. I don’t think we should allow people to abuse the program and live completely off of it without support to improve

only if they were not able to work or is going through extreme circumstances with money

Yes, but make sure it is for a legit reason and people aren't just trying to not work

Yes but only if they have a job and can't afford food.

Yes, but keep it minimal so as to not raise worry about the economy, but enough for food and housing

Yes, but only for those that can't find work after searching

if needed, yes

I believe that people should all at least get this to cover some necessities, but also be considerate of other like families who are really in need of the money or single parents who aren’t receiving child support or are being cheated of getting child support.

I support it only as a welfare replacement.

Yes, but there should be stricter regulations on who gets this money

No, I don't trust the government to determine a living wage consistently and I think people's income should be independent, not dependent on the government.

Yes, But only to the poorest and highest rates of poverty because in those areas it is very unlikely that someone would have any education, and that monthly check could help with that person getting an education and also provide family members with food, shelter, Clothes, etc.

I'm concerned that will just increase inflation just as higher pay is doing now.

Yes, funded by My plan:Bernie’s official website proposes a 0.5% tax on Wall Street Speculation, i propose a 3% tax and use that to fund College For All and eliminate student debt, plus the surplus of 1.22 trillion dollars. Then, expand social security 1300 dollars by forcing the rich to pay the same into social security as working families. Then, to fund Universal Pre-school, Universal Child Care, and Housing For All, Bernie Sanders proposes a wealth tax of 1% on household wealth above 32 million, 2% above 50 million, 3% above 250 million, 4% above 500 million, 5% above a billion, 6%…  Read more above 2.5 billion, 7% above 5 billion, and 8% above 10 billion. It would raise 435 billion dollars a year, and since Housing For All would no longer be needed because of a UBI it would raise 285 billion dollars, mandate corporations pay CEO’s within 50 times the amount of their average employee, and if not the corporation gets a penalty, and use this to pay off medical debt, as well as an additional 70 billion a year, I would spend what is necessary to reach net zero by 2030 which would be 2.5 trillion dollars over ten years, and fund it through 308.5 billion dollars by making the fossil fuel companies pay(literally pay money as well as pay for it), $640 billion from the revenue generated from the wholesale of energy from the regional Powers Marketing Administrations, Supplemental Security no longer being needed which would save 121.5 billion dollars, 131 billion dollars by reducing the need for safety net spending due to new jobs, a UBI, and Universal Health Care savings would raise 0.702 trillion, 300 Billion by returning corporate taxes to what they were under Obama and making corporations fully pay their taxes, fund Medicare For All by cutting prices in half, raise the estate tax, taxing capital gains at the same rates as incomes for the rich and large capital gains, replacing the cap on local tax deductions, eliminating health tax expenditures, and imposing a 7.5% tax on employers other than small business employers, which

Yes but there are some jobs that deserve more than what others are paid.

yes, but only if its under 30,000$

Yes but only for those who cant work, also covering basic necessities.

The governement can use those money to ask for lower taxes and use those money in other field

You should have to qualify for it.

I think a universal basic income program would be helpful but they shouldn't make it to where people end up depending on the program.

people should get different amounts of sums of money that are relevant to their earnings and needs so people who don't need it don't get too much while people who do need it, do.

Yes, but in future when production becomes worker-independent

I dont kno

I don' t know what it is

No, this would add to the national debt

only if everyone benefits.

Yes but only if they are using the money for its designated purpose.

Yes, for lower income homes and middle income homes that are necessarily in need for food and housing programs as a supplement to tend to their families.

Yes, but if not followed, the person or people will have a decrease in income.