Try the political quiz

1,545 Replies

@9XGLXNQRepublican from Ohio answered…1wk

@9XFBKGCWorking Family from Texas answered…2wks

@9XDRZWRWomen’s Equality from South Carolina answered…2wks

I need a visual demonstration of what a F-35 fighter can do.

@Greyson-Holtzcla…Democrat from Texas answered…2wks

At this point we shouldn't considering how much we spent on it

@9X3D69PIndependent from Florida answered…3wks

@9WQT4BFDemocrat from Oregon answered…1mo

I would like to know more about this F-35 stealth fighter to determine if its worth it

@9H5H43LWorking Family from Virginia answered…1yr

Only if it is safer and more cost effective to obtain the information in an alternative way.

@9H55JYRWomen’s Equality from Illinois answered…1yr

Yes, and we should use that money to restart F-22 and F/A-18 production.

@9H3DKL4Democrat from Illinois answered…1yr

No, we already spent the money, but there should be much more regulation of taxpayer funds on military R&D that should be limited.

@9H2D6LVWomen’s Equality from North Carolina answered…1yr

I feel that I do not know enough about this topic to contribute an answer.

@9GZ5LY5Women’s Equality from Washington answered…1yr

No, but stricter financial oversight of the program needs to be implemented.

@9GXWSNQWomen’s Equality from South Carolina answered…1yr

No; but investigate and drop all companies who are charging inflated prices.

@9GXVK3HWorking Family from Kansas answered…1yr

@9GVY5GTTranshumanist from Colorado answered…1yr

Unless it has done any harm to anyone or anything, then it could be continued. But it all depends if this F-35 fighter will either be a successful multi-dollar product or be an unsuccessful waste of money.

@9GVWGMRWorking Family from Texas answered…1yr

@9GSXVZ6Republican from Florida answered…1yr

No, but try to reduce the cost and make all the parts in the U.S.A.

@Beth-SimsGreen from Arkansas answered…1yr

@9GRS43YDemocrat from Alabama answered…1yr

No, but future acquisitions must be under more scrutiny for cost and requirement overruns

@9GLWBKMIndependent from Kansas answered…1yr

No, but production should be slowed until costs are more affordable.

@9GKH5L2Libertarian from Illinois answered…1yr

No, too much money has been spent on the project to cancel it

@9GJMHPZDemocrat from New Jersey answered…1yr

@9GG9SKTGreenfrom Vermont  answered…1yr

Yes, Military spending is already extreme. If the United States focused more on peace instead of interference and surveillance, we wouldn't need ridiculous amounts of war machines.

@9G9H9FFTranshumanist from Washington answered…1yr

No, The F-35 fighter is one of the most technologically advanced fighters in the world and should be kept in production to strengthen the U.S. Air Forces capabilities abroad

@9G4NJKBSocialist from New York answered…1yr

Just f****n cut military spending. It takes up way too much taxpayer money, and we have way too many other domestic issues to deal with.

@9G2JYYTWomen’s Equality from Missouri answered…1yr

No, but the government should drastically decrease funding for the program. We should be frugal with tax payer dollars while also maintaining the highest technological readiness for our national security.

@9G3RK2DWomen’s Equality from Florida answered…1yr

It may be too late now but I do think money should be spent smarter. We should invest more into programs that will improve things not contribute to more war.

@9FVKXQPPeace and Freedom from Texas answered…1yr

Reduce the amount of F-35’s being produced in order to cut costs.

@9FRH9KGSocialist from South Carolina answered…1yr

@9FMN49ZWorking Family from Minnesota answered…1yr

I don’t have enough information to make an informed decision

@9FHPM5FLibertarian from California answered…1yr

Yes, and produce large-scale non-lethal combat alternatives instead.

@9FCWKSWTranshumanist from Kentucky answered…1yr

Yes if the program is replaced with a newer more advanced fighter or the F22 program is reactivated.

@9FBVGW4Peace and Freedom from North Carolina answered…1yr

@9F9LJ4JDemocrat from Wisconsin answered…1yr

Yes, funding for the fighter jets program has ballooned and grossly mismanaged.

@9F8KD4XPeace and Freedom from New York answered…1yr

@9F8CYGYIndependent from Florida answered…1yr

No, but they should reduce the amount they are spending on it.

@9W5K97HPeace and Freedom from Indiana answered…2mos

Yes I 1000% agree with not producing Fighter planes the average lifetime cost to maintain is about $1 trillion. With that amount of money, the government could help reduce our economic problems.

@9VSFGTZPeace and Freedom from New Jersey answered…2mos

@9V296L4Women’s Equality from Michigan answered…5mos

@9TVPD5NPeace and Freedom from Ohio answered…5mos


The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...