A sanctuary city is a city that adopts local policies designed to not prosecute people solely for being an undocumented individual in the country in which they are currently living. In January 2017, President Trump issued an executive order that would withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities. In April 2017 a federal judge ruled that Trump’s order was unconstitutional.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
@9KFK6J61yr1Y
Yes, because these people are likely considering becoming citizens in the future and likely don't have the means to do so yet which is probably why they're staying there. However, if they don't start to work on becoming a citizen within the first 2 years, they should not be allowed to continue to stay in the city.
@9D56JSV2yrs2Y
Only if the sanctuary status of the city is voted on by a referendum of the citizens of that city.
Sanctuary Cities should only be for migrants and refugees not for illegal immigrants.
@TimsTelegram3yrs3Y
Yes, but funding must not be used for Sanctuary purposes.
@8TBX7BB4yrs4Y
City/ State should be in charge it shouldn't be on the Federal level
@8S3JQHX4yrs4Y
@8QWFR9H4yrs4Y
@8M5MH9W5yrs5Y
Yes, if most of the undocumented people pay their taxes.
@8KV9QQ65yrs5Y
yes but try to supply them with jobs
@9CF9S742yrs2Y
Yes, but only if it fits the budget.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
