Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Mandatory Vaccinations

38.8k Replies

 @B5HHNQT from Minnesota  answered…3 days3D

People should have the choice to be vaccinated but they should be aware what harm it can cause to them and others that the kid interacts with

 @B4XKNVCDemocrat from Minnesota  answered…4wks4W

No, but it should be required to attend any public daycare or teaching facility, especially for diseases that are deadly or can become lethal.

 @B46CXQD from Minnesota  answered…2mos2MO

it should be the parents decision on when they would like to vaccinate their child unless they are unethical, then the government should step in.

 @B3VHTMNDemocrat from Minnesota  answered…2mos2MO

I don't think it should be required but hold parents liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children and they should have at least a flu shot to go to public school, and more for privates

 @B3P6TF2 from Minnesota  answered…2mos2MO

i think that the chemicals and ingredients of vaccines s well as the side affects of whatever is in the vaccine should be made public and not be required unless you are an immagrant trying to come into the us

 @B3L637C from Minnesota  answered…3mos3MO

Yes but with specific exceptions for those whose medical conditions prevent them from getting a particular vaccine

 @B36W7TSRepublican from Minnesota  answered…3mos3MO

It depends on the diseases and the child. For example some people are allergic or have major sensitivities to what are in the vaccinations and therefore cannot have vaccines.

 @B2VGQKN from Minnesota  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases, and as long as we know it's safe and isn't something the government is tryna use to harm us

 @B2LNNQD from Minnesota  answered…4mos4MO

No one should be forced to have to vaccinate their kids. It's up to them if they want their kid vaccinated or not. And when the kid grows up they can decide for themselves if they want to be vaccinated or not.

 @B2HFVWB from Minnesota  answered…4mos4MO

Yes, but only for certain certified vaccines not for any new thing that comes out people aren't comfortable with.

 @B2G8MYL from Minnesota  answered…4mos4MO

yes, but vaccines must have extensive research done on them first to know what they will do to our children long term. There should also be a requirement for enrolling your child into public school. If someone doesn't believe in the vaccines they should home or private school their children.

 @B2CJWW5 from Minnesota  answered…4mos4MO

I believe vaccination for newborns should be required cause its necessary and vaccination for school is important as well but, when it comes to vaccinations such as a Covid 19 vaccine or flu shot that can be optional.

 @B2BGPBW from Minnesota  answered…4mos4MO

I think yes if the vaccine has been tested and is proven to work. If a child has a disease that the vaccine will negatively impact, then they should be exempt from the vaccine. The vaccine should be the most harmless and have the fewest side effects for the children.

 @9ZGDL7X from Minnesota  answered…6mos6MO

no they shouldnt make it mandatory because that would get in the way of our basic human rights, I think it should definately be recommended but not forced or mandated

 @9YK7F7Z from Minnesota  answered…6mos6MO

1. decided at state level and 2. only for deadly contagious disease and 3. only if vaccination is free 4. and only to attend any government buildings including schools.

 @9Y2X5BV from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

No, because children should be allowed to have there own choice. Yes, because there are kids and they could get other kids sick in school. Yes and no.

 @9XVXSBC from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

no because I feel like its better to get the disease and get vaccinated for it then you know you might not get it again

 @9XQZ7PK from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, with exceptions like genetics being susceptible to certain diseases or major reactions to prior vaccinations

 @9XQKHPW from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

No, the government should promote bodily autonomy. However, give the power to individual businesses and schools to deny services to unvaccinated individuals. Also increase education on disease and disease preventatives.

 @9XPTJ28 from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

The federal government should not be the deciding factor on vaccinations, especially in cases of restrictive religious beliefs, but there should be policies on vaccinations in places like schools, childcare centers, and workplaces.

 @9XP443R from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

No, fund public add campaigns about risks and benefits, and hold parents financially liable (not criminally) if their kid transfers a disease to pay all health bills as a result

 @9XGLP3J from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Yes but if they have religious belifes against them they don't have to and if you can not afford them there should be more help to help people get vaccines to people who cant afford them

 @9XGCDB5 from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, I do think kids need vaccinations especially if it's like polio or something. But other not as common diseases, they don't need it I'd say.

 @9XBWF6Q from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but with exemptions for those who are physically unable to recieve and only for deadly and contagious diseases

 @9X5GZKD from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, because requiring for a preventable diseases is seen as a public heath that helps protect children and many other adults in the world.

 @9X59VCS from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

yes, but do it for the diseases that are contagious and make it optional for others as well. because of the 1st amendment.

 @9X55BRQ from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Actually regulate and research the ingredients allowed in our bodies. US is too lax with what is safe compared to other countries. The research is there. Make sure anything that is pushed on the public has no health repercussions

 @9WMH3M7 from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases and using vaccines that have been thoroughly tested and formally approved for use

 @9WHDV7XNo Labels from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Be like ¨yeah if you don´t want to sure but don´t say I didn´t warn you when you contract a horrible disease and die¨ as a long as they are 18 or over. it should be maditory for children.

 @9WGKQ4F from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, i believe the government should provide vaccines to everyone and if they refuse to take the vaccine they should be fined.

 @9WFG7TTRepublican from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

only if it is for like normal vacsense but not if they have to like COVID 19 should be choise to get or not

 @9W3CKDS from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but there needs to be acceptions for people with overarching health issues that put them at a higher risk if they receive vaccines that can cause allergic reactions.

 @9VTPQJ3 from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

it should be up to the parents if they want their child to get vaccinated it shouldn't be the governments

 @9VRGVL8 from Minnesota  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, if from a public health standpoint it is appropriate to require vaccinations for those who are too young and/or susceptible to disease; and offer the option to decline at a certain age such as 16, if there is education materials provided.

 @9V9HMSQWorking Family from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

Hospitals should genetically engineer vaccines so that kids under any condition wouldn’t have an allergic reaction.

 @9V886ZT  from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, state level governments should be comfortable protecting students in public schools from infectious disease.

 @9TZTQZPIndependent from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, except in cases where vaccination is medically contraindicated AND hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

 @9TSLHTX from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, but also have a right to Choose to not want to only if they have a valid reason for not choosing to do that,if its a deadly contagious disease then its absolutely required.

 @9TNZW72 from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

I think it is reasonable to vaccinate to a certain extent but I can see this getting out of hand because the COVID vaccine I personally think is useless and didn't slow the spread of COVID at all therefore I can see this getting out of hand and vaccines that are useless will be forced upon people.

 @9TMV42Y  from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

No, but you're very ignorant and unintelligent for not preventing diseases and prolonging the lifespan and health of your own children.

 @9THKM2N from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

Just let the family itself choose if they want to or not, unless the kids 100% need it, which they have it every year or so.

 @9TDSPZ3 from Minnesota  answered…8mos8MO

No, but the government should hold the pharma companies responsible for the deaths and adverse effects their vaccines cause

 @9T4J6KF from Minnesota  answered…9mos9MO

yes but only for deadly diseases with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

 @9SMWNXN from Minnesota  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but only for illnesses where a vaccine has proven to be a better and safer alternative than the actual illness. The Covid vax should never have happened.

 @9RYTNTB from Minnesota  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases and for children with religious beliefs that forbid use of vaccines.

 @9RYMTV9 from Minnesota  answered…9mos9MO

No, not until vaccine injuries are appropriately addressed and compensated for the lack of public education

 @9RYLCRX from Minnesota  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but allow those who want to opt out to do so after they have been well informed about the risks. Allow religious exemptions and have the vaccine be proven safe and have been at least 10 years old to really understand any affects it could have on people. Don't mandate newly made vaccines like covid

 @9RP6Z37Women’s Equality from Minnesota  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, if there are no underlying issues with the child. Example, if a child has had a life threatening reaction or reaction to a vaccine it will not be required.

 @9RFCVBZDemocrat from Minnesota  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, but only for non dna/rna altering vaccines and parents should be educated about all vaccines available

 @9LTJR86 from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

I don't think kids should require getting vaccinated by the governments. I think that more of their parents decision to want them to do it or not

 @9LGP73B from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but with exceptions with vaccines that can have deadly side effects, or enduce allergic reactions.

 @9LFXCLKIndependent from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Yes children shall be granted to be vaccinated for preventable disease because healthcare is a problem and kids are dying from that

 @9LCLD9J from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

No, require vaccination in order to attend school, public or private, fund public ad campaigns about risks and benefits, hold parents criminally liable for transferring, deadly diseases to other children

 @9L63KJF from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but with exceptions for children for whom vaccines are medically harmful, requiring multiple doctors to sign off on that

 @9L2MBL7 from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

The only required vaccines should be for important and potentially lethal diseases that would otherwise commonly attack the immune system through growing up over time.

 @9KKWFY2 from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, with exceptions for religious reasons and justifiable health concerns and cases where there is no clear danger to others in refraining (only potential personal risk)

 @9KGMG3S from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Three should be available and parents should know and understand the pros and cons to make their own educated decisions

 @9KFXYQ2Republican from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Yes but only for FDA approved vaccines that have been around long enough to know they dont have long term helath affects.

 @9K5NRZRPeace and Freedom from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

For the most part yes, unless of course some are allergic to it, the vaccination hasn't been properly tested, and if the vaccination causes really bad side affects especially ones that don't go away and or effect ones organs.

 @9JJV956 from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

They should because there could be a risk of them getting a disease. Again, not all kids should because children are mostly healthy but otherwise if they're in risk then maybe it's necessary.

 @9JCCMFYCA Common Sense from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Specific places can have restrictions but I don’t think they should be all over everywhere is restricted

 @9JC6MHYLibertarian from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

It should be used in deadly contagious diseases, with exception for those whose religion beliefs forbid use of vaccine

 @9JB6L82 from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

No, but there should definitely be incentives for vaccinating. I think vaccines are important but at the end of the day, it should be a choice not forced. Public schools could mandate though.

 @9J8CJR5 from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

yes, but only for vaccines that have 5 years of proven success during the time that it is voluntarily chosen by parents and the government provides public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits, and has 10 other countries that also have a track record of positive results.

 @9J7YLX3Democrat from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Require this for attending school and for either parent to work in public rather than from home, with criminal liability if they violate this. And incentivize by covering all vaccinations under a universal healthcare system, with tax breaks for keeping up with them.

 @9J45H7Q from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, unless the child is unable to receive the vaccine for a medical reason or condition (such as an allergic reaction, or otherwise advised against by a physician, etc.)

 @9J256MVRepublican from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

No, these decisions should not be up to the government to make. Leave it to the families but educate on the consequences of their choices.

 @9HVCP7S from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

They should have the opportunity for them to get them but it should be up to the parents or guardians of the child

 @9HVBF58 from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

For the vaccinations that have proven to be okay and not have any side effects are okay but all the other vaccinations should be up to the parents and the person who is going to get the vaccination

 @9HVBDYM from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Some vaccinations are proven to work but vaccines like the covid vax weren't proven to not have side effects but overall I think it should be up to the family

 @9HTN2PG from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

It is up to the parents and what they believe is best for their kids doctors cannot make them do anything only recommend stuff

 @9HT42FPRepublican from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only for diseases that are either terminal or cause life-long side effects, and they must be proven to be effective.

 @9HPVGDY from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

In some cases where there are a lot of children maybe but they should still be given the option of choosing.

 @9HLZZQ9 from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

Should be required to receive certain vaccinations, but have choice when it comes to boosters, flu, and other related to that

 @9HB7NWY from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

No, fund public awareness and information about vaccines. Hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children.

 @9H4T3PW from Minnesota  answered…1yr1Y

No, its the parents and kids choice if they want to get vaccinated for certain diseases or not they can decide because its their body and they get to choose

 @9GR7PVXProgressive from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

i agree with several of these "other stances" and also I think the parents should be criminally liable if the child gets very sick and/or dies in addition to if they transmit the disease.

 @9GQRHWKPeace and Freedom from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious belief forbid use of vaccines and those that have allergies. And if its required then it must be provided

 @9GKPMVN from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but it should free if it’s forced and should not be forced on those who’s religion does not allow it

 @9FX99DJRepublican from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

It should only be required for vaccines which have been tested and proven effective over years of research.

 @9FVX785 from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

I personally think that unless there is a proven vaccine that actually has physical evidence that it is safe and cures or prevents a deadly disease it should be option to get it but strongly advised, because its honesty up to the person what they think is safe

 @9FTTRWV from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should not be able to force you to get vaccines, but they can incentivise it with cash or some other reward

 @9FSPK5B from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

once kids hit 10-12 years old they should have their own choice on vaccines, the parents can decide for their kids before that.

 @9FLK2WV from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

I would say yes if for deadly diseases and with exceptions for those who have medical or religious restrictions against it.

 @9FK7DVZ from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

the vaccine needs to be safe and not like having bad side effects that can harm them more = more deaths potentially

 @9FCBZTVRepublican from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

It depends on the vaccine, if it is proven to help and doesn't harm you. I don't think the covid vaccine should be mandatory because it is still in it's testing phase and it is effecting kids.

 @9FC6SYD from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F9LLZ6 from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

It should be encouraged, but it is possible to have reasons to not be vaccinated like religious beliefs, and I think vaccines are important and everyone should get them, but that should be for them to decide.

 @9F8DK3T from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F7VNLJ from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F48DDP from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F44WBV from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, with the exception that religiously is against it to be allowed but be liable to be criminally charged for spreading the disease

 @9F2QYS6 from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F2NZ5G from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes and no because you shouldn’t have to get vacs for Covid but for t others that the parents to choose for there kid until there 18.

 @9F2NGS5 from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DYHMYZPeace and Freedom from Minnesota  answered…2yrs2Y

yes but only for the dangerous and deadly diseases. exceptions for people with religious beliefs that may not allow vaccines

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...