Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of Mandatory Vaccinations

38.8k Replies

  @@iNCNFeditorConstitution from South Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9X5HNJYConstitution from Missouri  answered…7mos7MO

I feel that everybody should have there own option to be vaccinated or not because there is reliable evidence that some vaccines have made people more sick and susceptible to those diseases and sicknesses

 @9VPVMSBConstitution from Arizona  answered…8mos8MO

Government needs to stay out of medical decisions and stop persecuting dr that disagree with the government stance and have found viable alternatives

 @9VLVMPWConstitution from Pennsylvania  answered…8mos8MO

Make pharmaceuticals transparent and easy tot understand and let people choose what care they get.(Go private)

 @9TH37TDConstitution from North Carolina  answered…9mos9MO

Yes, but only for public schools and for vaccines with a long history of proven effectiveness under the original definition of vaccines, which prevent disease transmission. Not for vaccines as redefined post-COVID, which now include treatments that mitigate symptoms rather than fully prevent transmission. This should also be decided at the state or local level, not by the federal government.

 @9T7SHSFConstitution from New York  answered…9mos9MO

vaccination is something that I would have to think about because it is not something I agreed on when COVID forced on the public and we were pulled aways from each other. People without a COVID vaccine where called murders when no one knew the reason behind the reason why some people didn't want to take to vaccine that. I believe people should have a chose to their own life.

 @9SQ47ZSConstitution from Texas  answered…9mos9MO

Unless you have proof that your are biologically unable to be inoculated with a vaccine because of an allergic reaction, I believe that children should be vaccinated, when able and before school. COVID was already enough of an example of why vaccination, especially pediatric vaccination, is important.

 @9M3BYHGConstitution from Oklahoma  answered…1yr1Y

After the last bunch of bs. We should have a choice. They aren’t too worried about all the disease coming with open borders of humanity in general. My body has not been right since that stupid shot and I caught covid 2 times after all the shots. My body my choice.

 @9BWTQQBConstitution  from Ohio  answered…1yr1Y

Make them mandatory for deadly contagious diseases, and give those with religious beliefs a choice for miscellaneous/non-deadly disease vaccines. Hold non-vaccinating parents criminally liable for passing on illness to other children if it results in that child’s hospitalization/death.

 @9KZCH9FConstitution from Texas  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only if the vaccine is proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be effective at neutralizing the disease in question, and does not cause any serious negative side effects for the child.

 @9JYX65FConstitution from Virginia  answered…1yr1Y

It's their life, If kids don't want it, then they should be entitled to their opinion. They are still kids but we should hear what they have to say.

 @9J4F48MConstitution from Kansas  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but ONLY for thoroughly proven vaccinations that actually work. No flu shots, covid, etc. should be allowed to be mandated.

 @9HRHVZKConstitution from Ohio  answered…1yr1Y

Yes for the older diseases like Polio, etc. Exceptions for religious beliefs. NO for Covid that has not been fully tested.

 @9HMNNLGConstitution from Florida  answered…1yr1Y

No, because this gives the government the opportunity of manipulating and taking control over the people by forcing us the take vaccines that are only ment to harm us like the covid vaccine for an example.

 @9HGBC8WConstitution from Kentucky  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only if the vaccine companies can be sued without caps for death, autism or other side effects.

 @9G7VJ4YConstitution from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, each person should be able to choose to vaccinate themselves and their kids, although it is encouraged

 @9FRXZ5HConstitution from California  answered…2yrs2Y

I think it should be an option whether or not they want their kids to get vaccinated it all depends on the parent.

 @9FQNDHRConstitution from Ohio  answered…2yrs2Y

Healthcare is a private issue between the individual and their doctors, including parents and their children. The choice to vaccinate children should be at the discretion of the parents and their right to confer with their doctors

 @9FFBBNMConstitution from Wisconsin  answered…2yrs2Y

I think people should be able to decide if they want a vaccine although the ones that are already in place are good and I don't see issues with them but ones like the covid vaccine should definitly be you choice.

 @9DXJ43LConstitution from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DQ7JPXConstitution from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DC9TVCConstitution from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should not have a say of what goes on at private businesses.

 @9D874PMConstitution from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

No. Parents should decide based on informed recommendations and consent. Risk benefit analysis as well as disclosure of all ingredients in a vaccine need to be made public.

 @9D58ZBZConstitution from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

only if the vaccine is a real vaccine like smallpox vaccine - something like the flue shot or covid shot should not be forced on anyone since it is not a true vaccine

 @8WLFLLQConstitution from Massachusetts  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, only if the Vaccine has gone through standard (pre-covid) testing and trials. (3 years+ of trials and statistics).

 @9GJ99D6Constitutionfrom Maine  answered…2yrs2Y

In Some cases but the vaccines should have long term effects recorded before routing to the public and especially children. The flu/Covid is not a deadly disease.

 @9C4FFCPConstitution from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BLD9QCConstitution from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9B5BV9ZConstitution from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

Any policy that is mandated by the Government is a little scary. If I believe it helps, then I should take it, if I dont then I could have that option. We have people aborting fetuses and label it as reproductive health. Struggling to reconcile this madness.

 @963GG8NConstitution from Oregon  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, as long as the vaccine has been thoroughly tested LONG-TERM and deemed completely safe before becoming required (with exceptions for religious reasons)

 @95YKN96Constitution from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes they should be required but only certain ones. Things that are optional like the ful and COVID-19 should stay optional.

 @95TCSK5Constitution from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes -Child hood normal diseases should be vaccinated, not the Covid useless vaccine. Allergic reactions excused. Not unvaccinated by choice.

 @95H3MMZConstitution from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Traditional vaccines should be required as they always have. Polio, mumps, TB, dyptheia, measles and small pox.

 @948SPRLConstitution from Alabama  answered…3yrs3Y

I believe it should depend on the child and the parents of whether or not they should get vaccines for diseases.

 @93LM9P5Constitution from Oklahoma  answered…3yrs3Y

No, the decision to vaccinate should be between the parents and their doctors.

 @93KJKWRConstitution from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

 @KimInWisConstitution from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

Only for fully vetted lengthy clinical trialed vaccines with proven long term usage not a health risk. These vaccines should also be Federally funded and provided at no cost.

 @93DGH9CConstitution from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes if they are deadly like a pandemic with the exception of those who have religious beliefs that prevent it

 @93D8BV5Constitution from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

The government is supposed to serve the people, no 'requirements" for anything concerning a person's body.

 @92MCMTWConstitution from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92KJLNFConstitution from Colorado  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes if the vaccine can actually prevent the disease and wipe out the disease on earth

 @92HTMPWConstitution from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

 @92CN6NFConstitution from Florida  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZYHGGBConstitution from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8ZWLHFFConstitution from Utah  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but require it for public school, also while giving public online schooling options for those that choose not to get vaccinated.

 @8ZVNP66Constitution from Utah  answered…3yrs3Y

No, the government shouldn't have any say pertaining to an individual's health

 @8ZMP3FCConstitution from Indiana  answered…3yrs3Y

No, because they should have the choice to get it or not depending on their age

 @8ZHF3QPConstitution from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Depends on the disease and if person is part of religion that doesn’t allow vaccines.

 @8ZC5PDFConstitution from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but with tried and tested vaccines that are necessary to prevent serious diseases, but also in respect of religious beliefs.

 @8Z8JQNHConstitution from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

Forcing medical intervention is tyrannical and prompts quick removal of any despot in power.

 @8YY4SJXConstitution from California  answered…3yrs3Y

I think it would go against there right if we make them take it but we should do daily test or weekly on people who are or aren't vaccinated

 @8YVK28JConstitution from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YRMBRYConstitution from Utah  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only given proper research and approval and with exceptions for religious beliefs.

 @8YQCMNKConstitution from California  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only after proving a child is better with it. And allow exemptions.

 @8YP5DPSConstitution from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YLC4N8Constitution from South Dakota  answered…3yrs3Y

No, and they should be able to be treated normally, and attend public and privates schools.

 @8YKZ5M5Constitution from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only after the vaccine has been tested and tried for many years

 @8Y6GT7CConstitution from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XW5Z6KConstitution from Utah  answered…3yrs3Y

No, it is your choice and your choice alone, the government can not decide

 @8XS73GHConstitution from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Life threatening and highly transmisable treatments may be generally required if and only if vaccine type and formula is time proven to be safe; however a/an informed/ counseled person may may choose to decline vaccination

 @8XMJY5GConstitution from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but if it's deadly, and the vaccine is safe and effective, then yes.

 @8XHFRS7Constitution from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XG3Z3DConstitution from Oregon  answered…4yrs4Y

No, this should be a parents decision or their kids decision. Parents should also not be liable for other children contracting deadly diseases.

 @8XDXRMPConstitution from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if the vaccine is safe and effective. And if the disease is very deadly.

 @8XCSKYYConstitution from Idaho  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8XC4LFVConstitution from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, the government should be incapable of forcing a medical treatment, because there are unknown side affects. It is the best technology we have so if you desire to use it that’s amazing for you. But to force that decision on anyone else is out of the line every individual should decide for themselves and if they are punished for not getting it. I would hope legal battles are fought and just compensation is awarded to the individual who’s choice was under minded by circumstances of being able to to provide for their family or for themselves.

 @8XBWGCDConstitution from Delaware  answered…4yrs4Y

No, I have a child with an auto-immune disease and I don't want to give her a vaccine that doesn't have enough studies done over time with her disease.

 @8X6STYPConstitution from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8X6BNY6Constitution from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Only of the disease is extremely deadly, and the vaccine is safe and works.

 @8X5R5Z7Constitution from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WYBB52Constitution from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

Vaccines should only be mandatory after sufficient research has been done. This can take many years to find side effects and long lasting effects.

 @8WXR67GConstitution from Pennsylvania  answered…4yrs4Y

I feel that in the current environment that this question is to broad. Some vaccines have been proven effective, Some we don’t know enough about.

 @8WWWS8ZConstitution from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if the disease is very deadly, and the vaccine has proven to work and has hardly any side effects

 @8WV99C4Constitution from California  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if the disease is very deadly, and the vaccine has proven to work and has barely any side effects.

 @8WT7PVYConstitution from California  answered…4yrs4Y

No, only if its very deadly, and the vaccine has proven it works and doesn't have hardly any side effects

 @8WR2JP4Constitution from Florida  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8WP5PN6Constitution from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

If it is proven to be no harm to children, then they should be required in public schools

 @8W7D727Constitution from Virginia  answered…4yrs4Y

That's your choice. I can encourage you to get vaccinated, but in the end, I can't force you. To do that would be opening a can of worms that would allow the Government to take away our rights.

 @8VDFC2ZConstitution from Georgia  answered…4yrs4Y

The federal government should not be allowed to decide this, and all vaccines should go through thorough testing WITH long term (10+ year studies) before being released to the public as "safe"