Try the political quiz

397 Replies

@698S2GZRepublicanfrom Florida  answered…3mos

The Constitution is for our protection..not for the protection of suspected terrorists. If someone is on the "no fly" list... they need to prove themselves innocent/safe. I agree this sounds like it is against "innocent until proven guilty" but do we want innocent until you kill 200 people ?

@9R7MGW6Transhumanist from Minnesota answered…2wks

@9R7ML7GConstitution from Michigan answered…2wks

Any and all control of armaments as per the 2nd amendment is a violation of your 2nd, 8th, 9th and 14th amendment.

@9R2NKKDVeteran from New Jersey answered…3wks

People with ties to terrorist groups or are suspected to be a terrorist should be banned from buying guns and ammo.

@SatironyIndependent from New York answered…3mos

Only if they are background checked and found to be a suspected terrorist.

@9H2D6LVWomen’s Equality from North Carolina answered…3mos

I feel that I do not know enough about this topic to contribute an answer.

@9GZCYMMRepublican from Missouri answered…3mos

why are the on the no fly list and does it have anything to do with guns? Too broad of a question.

@9GXZDQYSocialist from Michigan answered…3mos

@9GSBT9WAmerican from Alabama answered…3mos

No they should not be able to fly. I mean come on people its literally in the name.

@9GP92HSWorking Family from Oklahoma answered…3mos

@9GLV357Socialist from Wisconsin answered…3mos

No. The "no-fly list" is unconstitutional and shouldn't exist.

@emmaleeantWomen’s Equality from Alabama answered…3mos

No, the no-fly list is not perfect, e.g. different people with the same name

@9FXZDC6Republican from Florida answered…3mos

Yes but only if there is a method to be reviewed and removed from the no-fly list for those cases where someone is flagged incorrectly.

@9FVQJJVWomen’s Equality from Georgia answered…3mos

If they are on the “no-fly list” they should have due process decided if there place on the list and there request to receive a gun is valid and does not endanger anyone.

@9FDV39HVeteran from Kentucky answered…3mos

No. The federal government should have no power to tell someone what kind of firearms they may or may not purchase. Discretion should be given to local lawmakers and firearms dealers.

@9FBHNVVTranshumanist from Florida answered…3mos

Depends on why you are band from flying. If there was violence or a terrorist threat then you shouldn't be able to get ammo or a gun. Now if you had a issue that involves you needing a service animal and your service animal was denied access to you and you ended up with anxiety attacks and they band you then you should be able to buy a gun as long as you are mentally stable.

@9F8L8R3Green from Maryland answered…3mos

No, the no-fly list should be banned, as it is does not have due process.

@9QDYCBWLibertarian from North Carolina answered…2mos

No, no adult should be banned from purchasing guns and ammunition

@9Q6RPRGRepublican from New York answered…2mos

On the edge, it is indeed a slippery slope that will lead to the govt to take away our guns but at the same point if you are deemed too dangerous to get on a plane you shouldn’t have a gun.

@9NX3Z3TVeteran from Arizona answered…3mos

Suspected terrorists should not be allowed entry into the country.

@9NMVRDKPeace and Freedom from Illinois answered…3mos

@Imani-MurryLibertarian from North Dakota answered…3mos

If an individual seller wants to refuse to sell to a person, that seller has the right to freedom of association.

@9MX98N9Progressive from California answered…3mos

The "no-fly list" is a small section U.S. government Terrorist Screening Database. No one in the database should be allowed to purchase a firearm. yet, any individual how is on the list should have a legal course of appeals through the courts to be removed from the list and have the right to purchase restored.

@Raegan-WauthierWomen’s Equality from Connecticut answered…3mos

yes, if they were banned from a plane for a reason I wouldn't trust them with a gun or ammunition.

@9M9N25ZRepublican from Wisconsin answered…3mos

I believe if they show that they will not be a danger to society they should be given the right to the 2nd amendment

@9M5WXFQTranshumanist from Indiana answered…3mos

No, and we need to improve the gun/ammo buying process with stronger background checks, psychological tests, and training

@9M2Y5QFGreen from Minnesota answered…3mos

@9LTMRM8Veteran from Tennessee answered…3mos

No, but yes if the ones on the "no fly list" have committed crimes that are unconstitutional.

@9LPT5XLWomen’s Equality from Texas answered…3mos

What are the requirements to be placed on the no fly list. If a person as been PROVEN to posses the requirements based of their actions and history. My answer would be yes

@9LJLFGZDemocrat from South Carolina answered…3mos

Yes, but only if they are not dangerous to their surroundings

@9LJ6J5FVeteran from New Jersey answered…3mos

@9L5CJG5Republican from Texas answered…3mos

@9L4ZM63Women’s Equality from South Carolina answered…3mos

It depends on their reasoning for being put on the no fly list, and plus this would probably be unconstitutional to deny someone's rights without due process, and also depends on whether they used a gun before or not, and in what way.

@9KXL4X4Republican from California answered…3mos

No, people can be placed on no fly lists by accident, and may not be aware of it.

@9KRLQ83Veteran from Virginia answered…3mos

There should be more of a background check on people on a no-fly list, but they shouldn't be outright stopped

@9KLG59HDemocrat from California answered…3mos

It depends on the reason they are on the no-fly list. People convicted of violent crime should be banned from purchasing guns and ammunition.

@9KBSZB8Working Family from Illinois answered…3mos

No, but look more into why they are on the “no fly-list” and base it off of that record

@9JR29P4Republican from Oklahoma answered…3mos

Yes, if they shouldn't fly because they are suspected terrorists then they shouldn't be able to buy an semi-auto or automatic weapon.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...