5 U.S. states have passed laws requiring welfare recipients to be tested for drugs. Proponents argue that testing will prevent public funds from being used to subsidize drugs habits and help get treatment for those that are addicted to drugs. Opponents argue that it is a waste of money since the tests will cost more money than they save.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
@4KBRM54 1mo1MO
Regardless, reform of welfare programs should be made. Social welfare should not be eliminated, but massive reforms should be made.
@8H46VR95yrs5Y
no. welfare should be abolished.
@8RDLHCJ4yrs4Y
yes, but welfare should be so limited that this isn’t even a topic of question
@8R32HLF4yrs4Y
No, but there should not be welfare programs anyway.
@8R29LB34yrs4Y
Yes, and only provide welfare to the disabled
@8Q599RK4yrs4Y
Yes. There honestly shouldn't be welfare recipients because there shouldn't be welfare (with the exception of the stimulus checks), but still, yes.
@8CBT6RK5yrs5Y
Yes, and bring an end to welfare.
@6K5JPLNLibertarian5yrs5Y
Regardless, we should reduce and reform social welfare programs
@9CJSMWRLibertarian2yrs2Y
No, abolish publicly funded welfare.
@9C4X23TLibertarian2yrs2Y
No welfare should be provided in the first place
@8YSMXC43yrs3Y
@4W5HV6NLibertarian5yrs5Y
Get rid of all welfare programs. Replace with socialized healthcare and UBI. Citizens have a choice between one or the other.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
