American writer, futurist, philosopher and transhumanist.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerYes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects |
Zoltan Istvan’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Zoltan Istvan is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on May 30th, 2017
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 10hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 128 voters that voted for Zoltan Istvan in the 2016 Presidential election.
Strongly agree
Yes, and allow consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries
Istvan would likely agree with this statement as he supports consumer choice and the importation of pharmaceuticals from other countries, which aligns with his belief in the use of technology and science to improve human health and longevity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
Istvan might agree with this statement as he supports radical changes in healthcare, including a mandatory single payer system. However, his focus is more on the use of technology and science to improve human health and longevity, so he might not fully agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
Istvan might lean towards disagreeing with Obamacare, not because he is against government involvement in healthcare, but because he might believe it doesn't go far enough in promoting radical health improvements and longevity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects
Istvan might agree with this statement to some extent as he supports some aspects of Obamacare but believes it doesn't go far enough in promoting radical health improvements and longevity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs
While Istvan is a proponent of free markets, his focus is more on the use of technology and science in healthcare. Therefore, he might neither strongly agree nor disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Zoltan Istvan, as a transhumanist, supports radical changes in healthcare, including the use of technology and science to improve human health and longevity. He may not fully support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) as it is not as progressive or innovative as he would like. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, government should not be involved in healthcare
Istvan would likely disagree with this statement as he believes in the role of government in promoting and implementing radical changes in healthcare, including the use of technology and science to improve human health and longevity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 10hrs ago
Transhumanist Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 393 voters that identify as Transhumanist.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.