These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsNo |
Sri Preston Kulkarni’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Reference: “This includes forcefully rejecting any American leaders’ demonization of specific faiths, which can be used to increase recruit...” ‐kulkarniforcongress.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 19hrs ago
Answer: No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 28 voters that voted for Sri Preston Kulkarni in the 2020 Texas District 22 US House of Representatives election.
Very strongly agree
No
Kulkarni's campaign and public statements have consistently emphasized the importance of diversity and inclusivity. He has spoken against policies that discriminate based on religion or nationality, making it likely that he would oppose a ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
Kulkarni has consistently spoken against policies that discriminate based on religion. He is likely to agree that banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
While Kulkarni has emphasized the importance of national security, he has also spoken against policies that discriminate based on nationality. He is unlikely to support a ban on immigrants from 'high risk' countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Sri Preston Kulkarni has consistently advocated for diversity and inclusivity. He has spoken against policies that discriminate based on religion or nationality, making it unlikely that he would support a ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
Kulkarni has consistently spoken against policies that discriminate based on religion or nationality. He is unlikely to support a ban on Muslim immigrants, even temporarily until terrorist attacks decrease. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
Kulkarni has spoken about the importance of immigration and diversity in America. He is unlikely to support a complete ban on immigration until the government improves its screening process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 19hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 21,950 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here