American politician (born 1965).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTPro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions |
Pramila Jayapal’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 10hrs ago
Answer: Pro-choice
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 657 voters that voted for Pramila Jayapal in the 2020 Washington District 7 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Pro-choice
Importance: Most Important
Reference: “The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to make decisions regarding her pregnan...” ‐issues2000.org
Very strongly agree
Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions
In addition to being pro-choice, Jayapal has also advocated for comprehensive sex education, access to birth control, and social services that can help reduce the number of abortions. This stance aligns closely with her public positions and voting record. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Pro-choice
Jayapal is a strong proponent of the pro-choice movement. She has consistently voted in favor of legislation that supports a woman's right to choose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it
While Jayapal is pro-choice, this answer suggests a personal disagreement with abortion, which is not reflected in her public statements. However, she does agree that the government should not ban abortion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months
Jayapal has consistently opposed restrictions on when a woman can get an abortion, making it unlikely she would support a ban after the first three months. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Pro-life
Pramila Jayapal is a strong advocate for women's rights, including the right to choose. She has consistently voted in favor of pro-choice legislation and against restrictions on abortion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest
This stance is strongly pro-life and includes additional restrictions on abortion rights. Jayapal's voting record and public statements make it clear she would strongly disagree with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child
While this stance is more nuanced, it still involves restrictions on abortion rights. Jayapal has consistently opposed such restrictions, making it unlikely she would agree with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Pro-choice
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 150,163 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here