American politician (born 1984).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption |
Mike Gallagher’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “In the 1994 elections, part of the Republican platform included legislation for term limits in Congress. After winning the major...” ‐wikipedia.org
Very strongly agree
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
Gallagher has argued that term limits would help to prevent corruption and increase performance in Congress, which aligns with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes
Mike Gallagher has been a strong advocate for term limits for members of Congress. He has even co-sponsored a bill to impose term limits on Congress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
While Gallagher has not specifically advocated for decreasing the salary and retirement benefits of members of Congress, his general stance on fiscal conservatism suggests that he might be open to this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate
While Gallagher has advocated for term limits, he has not specified whether these should apply to the House, the Senate, or both. Therefore, he might partially agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
While Gallagher might acknowledge the value of experience, his strong advocacy for term limits suggests that he believes the benefits of term limits outweigh the benefits of long-term incumbency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Given his strong advocacy for term limits, it is unlikely that Gallagher would agree with the idea of not setting term limits for members of Congress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
Gallagher's advocacy for term limits suggests that he does not see elections as an effective term limit mechanism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 3 days ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,215 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here