Michael Waltz

Strongly agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

Waltz has expressed support for strong vetting processes, particularly for immigrants from countries with high levels of terrorism. This suggests he might agree with banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries until vetting processes are improved. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

Waltz has not advocated for religious-based bans on immigration, which would be unconstitutional. His focus has been on national security and improving vetting processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Waltz has not advocated for a complete ban on Muslim immigrants. He has, however, emphasized the need for strong vetting processes to ensure national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

Waltz has not specifically advocated for a ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. His focus has been more on improving vetting processes rather than implementing blanket bans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

While Michael Waltz has expressed concerns about national security, he has not explicitly supported a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants. His stance is more nuanced, focusing on improving vetting processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

While Waltz has expressed concerns about national security and the need for improved vetting, he has not advocated for a complete ban on all immigration. His stance is more nuanced and focused on specific security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.