These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 18hrs ago
Answer: No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 86 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone
Peroutka would likely agree with this statement as he is a strong advocate for the right to bear arms and would likely see any restrictions on this right as a slippery slope towards more extensive gun control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Peroutka's strong belief in the Constitution and the right to bear arms would likely lead him to agree with this statement. He would likely see any restrictions on gun purchases as an infringement on constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process
Peroutka would likely agree with this statement. He is a strong supporter of the Constitution and believes in due process. He would likely see any restrictions on gun purchases without due process as unconstitutional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process
While Peroutka believes in due process, he is also a strong supporter of the right to bear arms. He would likely see any restrictions on this right, even with improved screening processes, as an infringement on constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka is a staunch supporter of the Constitution and believes in the right to bear arms. He would likely disagree with any measures that restrict this right, including banning people on the no-fly list from purchasing guns and ammunition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and ban the sale of guns and ammunition to anyone
Peroutka would strongly disagree with this statement. As a strong supporter of the Constitution and the right to bear arms, he would likely see this as a severe infringement on constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun
Peroutka would likely disagree with this statement. He believes in the right to bear arms and would likely see this as an infringement on that right, regardless of a person's status on the no-fly list. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 18hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 566 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here