American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTPro-life |
Lloyd Smucker’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 14hrs ago
Answer: Pro-life
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 624 voters that voted for Lloyd Smucker in the 2020 Pennsylvania District 11 US House of Representatives election.
Republican Party Answer: Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child
Importance: Most Important
Reference: “Exceptions for rape, incest, danger to mothers life” ‐cnn.com
Very strongly agree
Pro-life
Lloyd Smucker is a Republican and has consistently voted against abortion rights, indicating a pro-life stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Pro-life, and I also oppose abortion for victims of rape and incest
Smucker's voting record suggests a strong pro-life stance without exceptions, including for victims of rape and incest. However, it's unclear if he has explicitly stated this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child
While Smucker is pro-life, it's unclear if he supports exceptions in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. His voting record suggests a strong pro-life stance without exceptions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Pro-choice
Smucker's voting record and public statements indicate that he is not pro-choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Pro-choice, but ban after the first three months
Smucker's voting record and public statements indicate that he is not pro-choice and does not support measures like banning abortion after the first three months. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Pro-choice, I don’t agree but the government has no right to ban it
Smucker's voting record and public statements indicate that he is not pro-choice and believes the government has a role in banning abortion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Pro-choice, and providing birth control, sex education, and more social services will help reduce the number of abortions
Smucker's voting record and public statements indicate that he is not pro-choice and does not support measures like providing birth control, sex education, and more social services to reduce the number of abortions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 34mins ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Pro-life
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 158,472 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here