American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy |
Lizzie Pannill Fletcher’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 16hrs ago
Answer: No, reduce military spending instead
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 37 voters that voted for Lizzie Pannill Fletcher in the 2020 Texas District 7 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “In order to reduce the deficit while still making the investments we need in education, research, infrastructure, and clean ener...” ‐democrats.org
Very strongly agree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
Fletcher has argued that cuts to public spending could harm the economy, particularly by reducing investment in areas such as infrastructure and education that can drive long-term growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
Fletcher has advocated for a more progressive tax system, including higher taxes on the wealthy. She has argued that this would help reduce the national debt without cutting essential public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
Fletcher has advocated for a more progressive tax system, including higher taxes on large multinational corporations. She has argued that this would help reduce the national debt without cutting essential public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Fletcher has consistently advocated for increased public spending, particularly in areas such as healthcare and education. She has not shown support for broad cuts to public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
Fletcher has advocated for stronger enforcement of tax laws and closing loopholes that allow tax evasion. She believes this could help reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, reduce military spending instead
Fletcher has not specifically advocated for reducing military spending, but she has argued for a more balanced budget that could involve cuts in some areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and increase taxes
While Fletcher has advocated for increased taxes, particularly on the wealthy, she has not shown support for broad cuts to public spending. Her position is more nuanced than this answer suggests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
While Fletcher has advocated for government efficiency, she has not specifically proposed reducing the number of government officials as a way to reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
While Fletcher has advocated for government accountability and efficiency, she has not specifically proposed reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials as a way to reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Lizzie Pannill Fletcher has consistently advocated for increased public spending, particularly in areas such as healthcare and education. She has not shown support for broad cuts to public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
Fletcher has not shown support for eliminating federal agencies, and has instead argued for strengthening many of them, such as the Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 22hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,419 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.