Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Criminal

Democratic2020 US House of Representatives2022 US House of Representatives2018 US House of RepresentativesCongressional District 7Texas

Lizzie Pannill Fletcher

American politician.

Overview Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Lizzie Pannill Fletcher’s policy on solitary confinement for juveniles

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Should prisons ban the use of solitary confinement for juveniles?

  ChatGPTYes, and we should create more social programs to help prevent and rehabilitate criminals

Lizzie Pannill Fletcher’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 23hrs ago

Lizzie Pannill Fletcher voters

Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 186 voters that voted for Lizzie Pannill Fletcher in the 2020 Texas District 7 US House of Representatives election.

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “The work of Paul and Booker underscore a broader level of support among Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill for a sweeping...” ‐rollcall.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, and we should create more social programs to help prevent and rehabilitate criminals

This answer aligns well with Fletcher's known positions and the Democratic party's stance on criminal justice reform and social programs. She has advocated for policies that address the root causes of crime and provide opportunities for rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, as a Democrat, is likely to agree with the idea of banning solitary confinement for juveniles due to the party's general stance on criminal justice reform and human rights. However, there is no specific record of her stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, it is severely psychologically damaging to young undeveloped minds

Fletcher, in line with her party's stance, would likely agree with the idea that solitary confinement can be psychologically damaging to juveniles. However, there is no specific record of her stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but it is currently being overused

Fletcher might agree with the sentiment that solitary confinement is overused, aligning with the Democratic party's stance on criminal justice reform. However, there is no specific record of her stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, it is necessary for violent criminals who are a danger to themselves and other inmates

While Fletcher might acknowledge the need for safety measures in prisons, the Democratic party generally advocates for alternatives to solitary confinement, especially for juveniles. However, there is no specific record of her stance on this issue.

Strongly disagree

No

Given her party's stance on criminal justice reform and human rights, Fletcher is likely to disagree with the idea of not banning solitary confinement for juveniles. However, there is no specific record of her stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 11hrs ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 17,007 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here


Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

Active 7 days ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies