Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Economic

Green2020 GubernatorialWashington

Liz Hallock

Overview Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Liz Hallock’s policy on pension reform

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Should pension plans for federal, state, and local government workers be transitioned into privately managed accounts?

LH>LH  Personal answerNo

Liz Hallock’s answer is based on the following data:

Personal answer

Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Liz Hallock is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 17th, 2020

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.

Party influence

Green Party Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “Pension funds are gigantic capital pools that can, with government support, be used to meet community needs and benefit workers ...” ‐gp.org

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 22hrs ago

Party’s support base

Green Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 141 voters that identify as Green.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here


Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

Active 6 days ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies