Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Congressional District (2014-2024):

978 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...13yrs13Y

No

 @52PZV38Democratcommented…3yrs3Y

Employees agreed to perform a specific job with a defined set of compensation. Changing the employees' compensation violates this agreement. If you would like to change the compensation for future employees that may be fair but keep in mind that those interested in the job may not be as eager to apply if the compensation has changed. This is already visible in many public service areas.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...13yrs13Y

Yes, pension spending is out of control and must be reduced

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...13yrs13Y

No, privately managed accounts will jeopardize the financial security of senior citizens

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...13yrs13Y

 @cryingleftist from Texas  answered…6yrs6Y

It should be up to the worker in question whether they'd like to or not.

 @52P5M5SLibertariananswered…6yrs6Y

I think it should the be workers choice but give incentives for private accounts and insure that the worker will not lose any money if they choose to privatizetheir pension plan.

 @8GPQNKC from New Mexico  answered…6yrs6Y

 @9KL2GQ3from Vermont  answered…2yrs2Y

Pension plan should be public, however I am not oppose to private pension plan on top of it, as long as there is a public pension plan that can pay enogh for the elderly people to live well

 @8GY6QN3 from Illinois  answered…6yrs6Y

Yes because government employees should have to budget for their future like everyone else does.

 @975GXH8 from North Carolina  answered…4yrs4Y

If the government worker wants the plan to be transitioned to a private account that should be allowed.

 @7Z65922Democrat from Georgia  answered…6yrs6Y

No, but I think it should be the workers' choice, therefore give incentives for private accounts and insure that the worker will not lose any money if they chooses to privatize their pension plan

 @BDPN3G3 from Florida  answered…3wks3W

 @BDL9WJK  from Massachusetts  answered…4wks4W

 @BDC4VMTRepublican from Colorado  answered…1mo1MO

I don't have an opinion on it, I'm not educated on this subject enough to know

 @BD4JDQ3answered…2mos2MO

No, but there should be alternatives found to fund senior aged workers and retirees.

 @BD479HP from Pennsylvania  answered…2mos2MO

 @BCT4BQDDemocratfrom Maine  answered…2mos2MO

it should be a mix and open to choice decision of the workers when being signed.

 @BCJ3NLHLibertarian from Utah  answered…2mos2MO

indifferent, the transition to privatized banks would pose some threat to large banks, which would be good, but an untrustworthy bank could ruin millions

 @BC83NKSNo Labels from Texas  answered…3mos3MO

We should not have pension plans, and people should be allowed to spend their money on what they wish.

 @B9BHJ3H from New York  answered…5mos5MO

I feel you should have the choice to manage your own, or have the gov’t continue to manage it for you

 @B6W89K2 from Kansas  answered…9mos9MO

I feel these workers should have options for investment similar to those who work in the private sector.

 @9W3LNR4 from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

I think that it should be up to the worker to decide whether or not they want their pension plan to be managed on a private account or not.

 @9VG46H4 from California  answered…2yrs2Y

It should be up to the individual's choice, however I believe that there should be incentives to transition to privately managed accounts

 @9TC6CGN from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Yea but only if our system is made for people to retire earlier and financial education is required from day one.

 @9SZD98W from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

No, because federal, states, and local government workers are not privately employed, so pensions should not be privately owned or operated.

 @9RQDN57 from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

Pension plans should be overhauled for more equity between generations and to allow for more fiscal responsibility and longevity

 @9K8LLG8 from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

The effectiveness of private accounts in ensuring the financial security of senior citizens depends on various factors, including the regulatory framework, investment options, and risk management strategies implemented within such plans.

  @9JRKJRK  from Iowa  answered…2yrs2Y

No, pensions should be public and guaranteed by the National Treasury, and people should not need to rely on market based schemes like IRAs and 401(k)s, insulated from the turbulence in the Market and the predatory nature of speculators.

 @9JC633B from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

Pensions should be the responsibility of the government to provide. After a career of public service the least the government can do is provide pensioners with an adjusted for inflation, full salary guaranteed lifetime pension.

 @9JBWMCFProgressive from Florida  answered…2yrs2Y

I dont really have a stance on this. I think that if new employees aheva private plan, so be it but I dont think that any changes should be made to current workers

 @9HSGSGP from New Jersey  answered…2yrs2Y

The workers should be allowed to choose if they want to manage the accounts themselves or keep it in government management.

 @9HBZSD4answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, if the government worker makes the choice to transition their pension into a privately managed account.

 @9H4C2MQRepublican from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

Recipients should be able to choose whether they want their plan managed by the government or by themselves.

 @9GTY55Z from Maryland  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes - definately for all future workers including Congress and the Prez. In addition, Local, State and Feds and any remaining private or semi-private companies need to come up with a plan - and stick to it - so that all current pension plans are fully funded and invested. Pensions were a nice theory, but allowing companies to defer fully funding them each year, esp. during the baby boomers years has created a huge deficit, burden and problem for the financial current and future of those programs. This is a topic most ordinary citizens do NOT understand.

 @9GKCSD3 from Maryland  answered…3yrs3Y

Only for future workers, since older workers won't be able to deal with the volatility of the market very well.

  @bmelan1 from Louisiana  answered…3yrs3Y

Pensions such as this should not be limited to just federal, state, and local government workers. Everyone deserves to be funded enough to live reasonably in their final years.

 @9G7PHH9 from California  answered…3yrs3Y

If they decide to put the plan into private accounts, they should be able to do that. It should not be mandatory, but optional.

 @9G6Y6KR from Arkansas  answered…3yrs3Y

This should be decided by the federal, state, and local government, not a unanimous one-size-fits-all rule.

 @9FRJ4JPLibertarian from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, the federal government has no right under the constitution to be involved in pensions or retirement funds.

 @9FQ26VW from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

It should be provided as a choice to recieve pensions through private and public forms.

 @9FJ48JHIndependent from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9FHSDSH from California  answered…3yrs3Y

No, unless we plan to pay gov workers more . This the only thing they can count on , otherwise they would work in private sector,

 @9FHR3H8 from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9FGPMZXLibertarian from Indiana  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9FGNGV4Forward from Michigan  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9FFXQ8Sfrom Maine  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9F9L92H from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

No, the government has promised a pension of governmental work and thus they must abide by it.

 @94355D7  from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9F8QS8H from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, as long as everyone is, or can be in control of, their own accounts

 @9F8D4M8 from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @84ZWD6LLibertarian  from Pennsylvania  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, privatize all federal government pensions, and give taxpayers the option to privatize social security

 @9F6WN8WDemocrat from Nebraska  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, pension spending is out of control, but we should allow senior citizens to receive benefits allowing them to be okay after retirement.

 @9F54P4K  from Tennessee  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but it should be a the workers' discretion whether they use a privately or publicly managed account.

 @igeryuIndependent  from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

No, only for employees that opt to transition to privately managed accounts

 @9DZGBZFRepublican from California  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9DY7ZWLDemocrat from North Carolina  answered…3yrs3Y

No, but the worker should still have the option of privatizing his/her plan. Ensure that the worker will not lose any money if he/she chooses to privatize his/her pension plan

 @9DXYJN8 from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

They should be moved in a way that works with social security as opposed to independently so that we don’t pay twice.

 @9DW4VSC from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9DTGMHY from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Existing plans should remain the same because senior citizens depend on it and it should not be disrupted. New participation should be phased out.

 @4QB9SVF answered…3yrs3Y

Doesn't matter. They employer and employee can decide whatever they like.

 @9DRHX76  from Georgia  answered…3yrs3Y

Any such pension funds should go towards the budget for universal basic income, as everyone should benefit from a level of basic assistance with no distinction between those who do and do not work for the government of any particular jurisdiction

 @9DRGWJN from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but privately managed accounts must be fully protected no matter what, and al employees must be required to contribute a certain amount to each retirement account.

 @9DQQ6LH from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and all employees should be required to make contributions to their retirement accounts.

 @9DQ68DZ from Kansas  answered…3yrs3Y

It should be determined by each individual which they want to be with.

 @9DM85TD from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

Give employees the option of a pension, private accounts, or a split between the two.

 @9DM5L7KIndependent from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but transition new employees now and give current employees option to transition or remain in current system.

 @9DL7RYL from Missouri  answered…3yrs3Y

I think they should have to choose pension or 401(k) not but 5% either way should be bare medium

 @9D8YKMB from Minnesota  answered…3yrs3Y

Federal, state, and local governments should make their own decisions on where to invest pension money. Input should be taken from the workers.

 @9D8LF34 from Washington  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9D7ZX46 from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

  @YauntiCommunist from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

No, abolish private property and wealth accumulation. Unionize all people and create a UBI system

 @9D5Q7RB from New Jersey  answered…3yrs3Y

get rid of them all and give government employees the same freedom to invest or not invest part of their income like the rest of us. Government pensions is one of the biggest swords dangling over our economy. Plus I want most government employees gone anyway.

 @9D598QF from Illinois  answered…3yrs3Y

 @9D575F4Independent from Wisconsin  answered…3yrs3Y

All pension programs should be eliminated, instead every citizen should have a annuity bank account that 5% of there check goes into and can't be touched until they retire

 @9D53PYX from Virginia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but the accounts should be the type that still gain. Although maybe gained slower during recessions and depressions those type of accounts do exist. They're usually broad-based and they work well. There were people that actually made more money during the Great depression because of broad-based accounts that worked well so that caveat should be in place to ensure that these pensions cannot disappear. They'll be stable, long-term growth pensions

 @8RN2J9V from Illinois  answered…5yrs5Y

I feel that I am not educated enough on this issue to contribute a stance.

 @BC3MHDG from Oregon  answered…3mos3MO

Simply working in government should not boost you above others who possibly worked harder than you throughout their life, it should be similar to other rates.

 @B72YMLY from South Carolina  answered…9mos9MO

Missed my pension by a few years. This is Union speak. Why is this relevant to a quiz to 10th graders.

 @B622KX2Libertarian from California  answered…11mos11MO

No, pension plans for government workers should not be entirely transitioned to privately managed accounts.
Instead, governments should consider modernizing and securing existing pension systems through reforms like:

Adjusting benefit formulas,

Improving funding practices,

Offering hybrid plans (a mix of pension and private account), and

Enhancing financial education for public workers.

This balanced approach preserves retirement security while addressing sustainability and fairness.

 @B5ZGVNGRepublican  from Illinois  answered…11mos11MO

Pensions should not be taxed and should be managed privately by their owners once retiring but while still being employed it should be co-managed with the company and owner of the pension

 @B5Z9R8G from Minnesota  answered…11mos11MO

Should be an option for each individual worker, with the government giving several options for managing companies.

 Deletedanswered…12mos12MO

They have rights to put their pension plans to private account, but give them important advice not blow too much money on private accounts.

 @B5YQRG9Peace and Freedom from Utah  answered…12mos12MO

No, it should be a personal choice, however there should be incentives or options for the transition.

  @Kit-WolfkatProhibition  from GU  answered…12mos12MO

It should be the workers' choice, therefore give incentives for private accounts and ensure that the worker will not lose any money if they chooses to privatize their pension plan

 @B4MD98P from Illinois  answered…1yr1Y

No, with privately managed accounts there is a higher risk of losing money from either a scam or the economy.

 @B4LG78R from Louisiana  answered…1yr1Y

i think that the worker should be able to choose and be insured that they will not lose any money if they choose to go private

 @B35T9YR from New Jersey  answered…1yr1Y

I don't think anything should necessarily be required or regulated, but it is up to each individual.

 @9WCZB9C from New York  answered…2yrs2Y

No the government shouldn't be privet about anything the people should know what the government is doing at all times.

 @9W5N2VC  from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

My thoughts are pulled on this one. I believe that It should be up to the citizen to have a private account.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...