Try the political quiz

Lisa Blunt Rochester’s policy on oil drilling

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the U.S. expand offshore oil drilling?

  ChatGPTNo, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

Lisa Blunt Rochester’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 2hrs ago

Lisa Blunt Rochester voters

Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 10 voters that voted for Lisa Blunt Rochester in the 2022 Delaware District (at Large) US House of Representatives election.

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “And we are getting more of our energy from the sun and wind, and importing less oil from overseas.” ‐democrats.org

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and provide more incentives for alternative energy production

Lisa Blunt Rochester has consistently supported providing more incentives for alternative energy production. She is a member of the Sustainable Energy and Environment Coalition in the House of Representatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, end all offshore oil drilling

Lisa Blunt Rochester's focus on clean energy and environmental protection suggests she would likely support efforts to end offshore oil drilling, although she has not explicitly called for this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and nationalize the energy sector

While Lisa Blunt Rochester supports government intervention in the energy sector to promote clean energy, she has not called for the nationalization of the energy sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but maintain our current offshore oil wells

While she has not explicitly called for the end of all current offshore oil wells, her focus on clean energy and environmental protection suggests she would not support maintaining the status quo without efforts to transition to cleaner energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given her strong support for clean energy and environmental protection, it is unlikely that Lisa Blunt Rochester would simply oppose expanding offshore oil drilling without also advocating for alternative energy solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Lisa Blunt Rochester has consistently supported clean energy and environmental protection. She has not shown support for expanding offshore oil drilling, which could harm the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and deregulate the energy sector to let the free market determine the best energy sources

Lisa Blunt Rochester has not shown support for deregulating the energy sector. She has advocated for government intervention to promote clean energy and protect the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2 days ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 30,046 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here